Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (studygurl14):

calculus @zepdrix

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Would the antiderivative of \(\Large \frac{x^{-1}}{2}\) equal \(\large \ln(\frac{1}{2}x)\) or \(\large\frac{1}{2}\ln x\)? Or neither... @zepdrix @ParthKohli

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\large\rm \int\limits \frac{1}{2x}dx\quad=\quad \frac{1}{2}\cdot\int\limits \frac{1}{x}dx\quad=\quad \frac{1}{2}\cdot \ln|x|\]

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

How come you can pull out the constant like that?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Because constant coefficients are stupid, nobody loves them.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Ummm

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

lol, ok

zepdrix (zepdrix):

It's the same with limits and such, hopefully you remember back to those ideas... The only things you can't pull out, are the things that are changing, so anything involving x. 1/2 does not ever change. So the integral doesn't depend on it in any way.

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

ok

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Just be careful how you pull them out, realize when you pull it out front, it now represents a coefficient multiplying THE ENTIRE THING. Example:\[\large\rm \int\limits 2x+2~dx\quad\ne\quad 2\int\limits x+2~dx\]That 2 is multiplying the entire thing! Which would give us 2x+4 if we put it back in.

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

so would this be correct?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\large\rm \int\limits 2x+2~dx\quad=\quad \int\limits2(x+1)dx\quad=\quad 2\int\limits x+1~dx\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

No no no,\[\large\rm (1+2x)^{-1}\quad\ne\quad 1^{-1}+(2x)^{-1}\]In general,\[\large\rm (x+y)^a\quad\ne\quad x^a+y^a\]

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Oh...okay, so what do I do?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Well, this integral is a tad trickier than the ones you've dealt with before. You can either do a quick substitution, u=1+2x, OR preferably, you can just sort of guess your way along. There is this technique called "advanced guessing" that we use often for problems like this.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

We know that:\[\large\rm \int\limits\frac{1}{x}dx\quad=\quad \ln|x|\]So we're expecting that \(\large\rm\int\dfrac{1}{1+2x}dx\) should give us "something like" \(\large\rm ln|1+2x|\) right?

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

yeah. I did the u substitution and got \(\Large \frac{1}{2}\ln|1+2x| +C\) is that correct?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Yay good job \c:/

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Thanks :)

zepdrix (zepdrix):

u-sub is really burdensome for a problem like this, errr i should say, it will be later on. But I suppose at this stage it's good to practice :))

OpenStudy (candi5a18):

hey because derivatie and integrals can be split into term by term

OpenStudy (candi5a18):

d/dx(f+g)= df/dx + dg/dx

OpenStudy (candi5a18):

we can go into more detail why the derivative is associative if u would like to learn

OpenStudy (candi5a18):

we can go into more detail why the derivative is commutative if u would like to learn

OpenStudy (candi5a18):

we can go into more detail why the derivative is distributive if u would like to learn

OpenStudy (candi5a18):

lol thats the right one

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!