calculus @zepdrix
Would the antiderivative of \(\Large \frac{x^{-1}}{2}\) equal \(\large \ln(\frac{1}{2}x)\) or \(\large\frac{1}{2}\ln x\)? Or neither... @zepdrix @ParthKohli
\[\large\rm \int\limits \frac{1}{2x}dx\quad=\quad \frac{1}{2}\cdot\int\limits \frac{1}{x}dx\quad=\quad \frac{1}{2}\cdot \ln|x|\]
How come you can pull out the constant like that?
Because constant coefficients are stupid, nobody loves them.
Ummm
lol, ok
It's the same with limits and such, hopefully you remember back to those ideas... The only things you can't pull out, are the things that are changing, so anything involving x. 1/2 does not ever change. So the integral doesn't depend on it in any way.
ok
Just be careful how you pull them out, realize when you pull it out front, it now represents a coefficient multiplying THE ENTIRE THING. Example:\[\large\rm \int\limits 2x+2~dx\quad\ne\quad 2\int\limits x+2~dx\]That 2 is multiplying the entire thing! Which would give us 2x+4 if we put it back in.
so would this be correct?
\[\large\rm \int\limits 2x+2~dx\quad=\quad \int\limits2(x+1)dx\quad=\quad 2\int\limits x+1~dx\]
No no no,\[\large\rm (1+2x)^{-1}\quad\ne\quad 1^{-1}+(2x)^{-1}\]In general,\[\large\rm (x+y)^a\quad\ne\quad x^a+y^a\]
Oh...okay, so what do I do?
Well, this integral is a tad trickier than the ones you've dealt with before. You can either do a quick substitution, u=1+2x, OR preferably, you can just sort of guess your way along. There is this technique called "advanced guessing" that we use often for problems like this.
We know that:\[\large\rm \int\limits\frac{1}{x}dx\quad=\quad \ln|x|\]So we're expecting that \(\large\rm\int\dfrac{1}{1+2x}dx\) should give us "something like" \(\large\rm ln|1+2x|\) right?
yeah. I did the u substitution and got \(\Large \frac{1}{2}\ln|1+2x| +C\) is that correct?
Yay good job \c:/
Thanks :)
u-sub is really burdensome for a problem like this, errr i should say, it will be later on. But I suppose at this stage it's good to practice :))
hey because derivatie and integrals can be split into term by term
d/dx(f+g)= df/dx + dg/dx
we can go into more detail why the derivative is associative if u would like to learn
we can go into more detail why the derivative is commutative if u would like to learn
we can go into more detail why the derivative is distributive if u would like to learn
lol thats the right one
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!