Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 10 Online
OpenStudy (studygurl14):

@zepdrix

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Integral of \(\Large 4^{-x}\)

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Ooo there's a tricky one huh :D

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\large\rm \int\limits 4^{-x}dx\] Do you remember this derivative?\[\large\rm \frac{d}{dx}a^x=?\]

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

yes, the derivative of a^x = a^x(ln x)(dx)

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

by dx I mean the derivative of x

zepdrix (zepdrix):

woops! we multiply by the log of the BASE :)\[\large\rm \frac{d}{dx}a^x=a^x(\ln a)\]

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Oh, right

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So if we integrate \(\large\rm a^x(ln a)dx\) we have to `divide out` the lna to end up with the correct answer, right?\[\large\rm \int\limits a^x(\ln a)dx=a^x\]So then,\[\large\rm \int\limits a^x dx=\frac{a^x}{\ln a}\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

And again, maybe for this problem, do a u-substitution to deal with the - on the x. u=-x

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

yes, but there is no ln a in the problem...

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Think about what integration is doing. Taking derivative told you to simply `multiply by (ln a)`. So then taking integral means you simply `divide by (ln a)`. When you take derivative, you `gained` an (ln a). So when you integrate, you `lose` an (ln a).

zepdrix (zepdrix):

We can be more fancy about it if you prefer, hmm thinking :)

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Oh, ok.

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

I understand that now.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Here is another idea, we multiply our integral by (ln a)/(ln a).\[\large\rm \int\limits \frac{a^x(\ln a)}{\ln a}dx\]We'll pull the bottom one out front, because it's an unloved stupid coefficient :)\[\large\rm \frac{1}{\ln a}\cdot\int\limits a^x(\ln a)dx\qquad=\qquad \frac{1}{\ln a}\cdot a^x\]

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Okay, and do we also then have to divide by the anti derivative of the exponent?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Yesssss, good good good. This trick of `dividing out the coefficient` only works when our x is `linear`. If we had like x^2 in the exponent, it would be a whole nother story! But yes, when it's just a linear x, we can do these little division tricks.

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

so the antiderivative of -x is -x^2/2, right?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

This will work for all kinds of linear coefficients, here is another example:\[\large\rm \int\limits \cos(2x)dx\quad=\quad \frac12\sin(2x)\] Derivative would normally `give us` an extra 2, so through integration `we lose` a 2.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Ooo my bad, I explained that bad I guess :) No, we're not taking the anti-derivative of -x. We're simply dividing by the coefficient -1 to compensate for chain rule.

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Oh, so then the answer would be \(\Large -\frac{4^{-x}}{\ln x}\) + C?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Good good good :) But again, try to put that exponent derivative to memory, `log of base`, not log of x.

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Ugh, so \(\Large -\frac{4^{-x}}{\ln 4}\)+ C?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

yay good job \c:/

OpenStudy (studygurl14):

Thank you!

zepdrix (zepdrix):

np

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!