Case closed wew
Oo this one is a little tricky :) Integration by parts business ya?
yas sure hahaha
I need to review everything
\[\large\rm \mathscr L\{t^2\}\quad=\quad \int\limits_0^{\infty}t^2 e^{-st}dt\]
\(\large\rm u=t^2,\qquad\qquad dv=e^{-st}dt\)
du and v? :)
du= 2t
i remember spending a ton of time practicing those things while in the class..., convolution , step function, shift, exe... now i can't remember a dam thing, well the integral definition i did
good good good.
prolly returns quickly if you practice a little
@DanJS Haha i even forgot everything 'bout integ
\[\large\rm \mathscr L\{t^2\}\quad=\quad \int\limits\limits_0^{\infty}t^2 e^{-st}dt\]\[\large\rm \mathscr L\{t^2\}\quad=\quad uv-\int\limits v~du\]\[\large\rm \mathscr L\{t^2\}\quad=\quad -\frac{1}{s}t^2e^{-st}-\int\limits\left(-\frac{1}{s}\right)2t~e^{-st}~dt\]Something like this, yes?
We'll have to evaluate everything at 0 and infinity, maybe we can do that now... or later... whatever you prefer.
Cause it looks like we have to apply Integration by Parts again :)
Oh imma don't like integ by parts. Imma sure ill be getting lost
what was the point of changing from the ' t '-space to that 's'-space anyway, besides solving a DE easier in that land
Let's bring any constant garbage out front, and combine the negatives,\[\large\rm \mathscr L\{t^2\}\quad=\quad -\frac{1}{s}t^2e^{-st}+\frac{2}{s}\color{orangered}{\int\limits\limits t e^{-st}~dt}\]So we're just applying parts to this orange portion.
Oh now that looks easier i think
Similar assignment for u and dv would be appropriate, ya? \(\large\rm u=t,\qquad\qquad\qquad dv=e^{-st}dt\)
du= dt, v= e^-st/s
\[\large\rm \mathscr L\{t^2\}\quad=\quad -\frac{1}{s}t^2e^{-st}+\frac{2}{s}\color{orangered}{\int\limits\limits\limits t e^{-st}~dt}\]\[\large\rm \mathscr L\{t^2\}\quad=\quad -\frac{1}{s}t^2e^{-st}+\frac{2}{s}\color{orangered}{\left[uv-\int\limits v~du\right]}\]\[\large\rm \mathscr L\{t^2\}\quad=\quad -\frac{1}{s}t^2e^{-st}+\frac{2}{s}\color{orangered}{\left[-\frac{1}{s}t e^{-st}-\int\limits \left(-\frac{1}{s}\right)e^{-st}dt\right]}\]
Sorry if I'm stealing all the fun here :) I can slow down on the integrals lol.
It really okay haha
That last integral is pretty straight forward, just another -1/s, in front of the exponential, right?
\[\large\rm \mathscr L\{t^2\}\quad=\quad -\frac{1}{s}t^2e^{-st}+\frac{2}{s}\color{orangered}{\left[-\frac{1}{s}t e^{-st}-\left(-\frac{1}{s}\right)\left(-\frac{1}{s}\right)e^{-st}\right]}\]
Yes yes im following you
How could i get 2/s^3?
Let's distribute to the orange stuff,\[\large\rm =-\frac{t^2e^{-st}}{s}-\frac{2te^{-st}}{s^2}-\frac{2e^{-st}}{s^3}\qquad |_0^{\infty}\]
So that's all the stuff we have. You might see where we'll EXPECT to get the 2/s^3 from, right? :)
Quiet confused with this -2e^-st /s^3
Ah yes I got it now swear haha
You have to evaluate all this mess at 0 and infinity. Maybe start with the FIRST TERM, cause you'll see something interesting happen.
Not sure how can i get the transform 2/s^3 haha sorry
Let's switch the limits and get rid of the negative in front\[\large\rm -\frac{t^2e^{-st}}{s}|_0^{\infty}\quad=\quad \frac{t^2e^{-st}}{s}|_{\infty}^0\quad=\quad \frac{0^2e^{-0}}{s}-\lim_{b\to\infty}\frac{b^2e^{-sb}}{s}\]
0+0+ 2/s^3 hahaha finally
Do you understand how to show that the first two terms are 0 though? :) Requires L'Hopital's rule. As long as you understand that, then yes we can say 0+0+(the last part).
Oh sorry internet sucks. Thank you so much @zepdrix :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!