Why is Na+ smaller than K+?
What do you think?
I think i got it.. Isn't it because of the size or the ions increasing going down a period?
you want to think of it in terms on atomic number. what does it represent?
Atomic number increases across a period. Na+ and K+ they both have 1 electron and 1 proton so why is Na+ smaller than K+? I just need an explanation
Have you heard of the concept of electron shielding? Na has far less electrons therefore much less shielding from the charge that the positively nucleus has on the electrons. K has more electrons than Na therefore it has more electrons that could potentially block the attraction of the nucleus on the furthest electron. For Na+ you have now lost an electron so the shielding on the now outermost electron just became even smaller and the ion of Na+ becomes even smaller. This also happens with K+ and the outermost electron also now has less shielding which in turn draws it closer to the nucleus. However K+ still has more electrons and more shielding occurring than Na+ does. Also it is known that atomic size increases moving down a group and this trend is known to be unchanging when involving ions of equivalent charges.
Na+ and K+ dont have 1 electron and 1 proton.
Yes got it! thank you so much yea sorry i didn't mean 1 electron and 1 proton i meant that they are both in the same energy level (1) one loses one electron and one gains an electron. Thank you sweetburger :)
ok sorry for the misunderstanding. Glad to help :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!