The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let μ denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paint under consideration. A test of H0: μ = 20 versus Ha: μ > 20 will be based on a random sample of size n from a normal population distribution. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations? (Round your P-values to three decimal places.) (a) n = 14, t = 3.1, α = 0.05 P-value = (b) n = 10, t = 1.8, α = 0.01 P-value = (c) n = 28, t = −0.6 P-value =
@PrincessVentures
so the problem here is that my table isn't very accurate... Do you know how to use R studio?
I can take a pic of the table if you want...
Please do. :)
sorry I lost connection... let me take a pic
@PrincessVentures
If you don't know it's okay. I can ask my instructor tomorrow.
@AravindG can you help me?
Please wait. The table is loading.
Your t table is different from mine. Mine has the division of two-tailed alpha and one tailed alpha.
hmmm let me check something
Nope that is right.
so this is what I have for part a 0.001<P-value<0.005
I'll leave this to @PrincessVentures . My pc becomes unresponsive when I try to open image of size greater than 3 mb. Sorry.
The value is between 0.001 and 0.005 however my numbers on the table are not very accurate. Is there a way to read it to a more accuarate decimal?
For example, you are given alpha=0.05. Your d.f is n-1;13 Since it is right-skewed (μ > 20), you get the +t Find d.f 13 and with the alpha 0.05 in your table.
ohhh wow it's 1.771
I must be reading the table wrong...
Openstudy is going loco. Can't access properly. :(
Anyway, you got it right. :D
i can see what yo are typing clearly
Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.
from my p value = 1.771 which of these are correct ?
our null = mu = 20 the probablility is 1.71 which is telling us that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higer than 20. The conceptual part is confusing me.
This is hypothesis testing. You familiar?
It is actually confusing me a bit too. You should just ask your professor tomorrow, I know that he will help you. I am familiar with it but I forgot already. I will try to recall. :) Will tell you if I remember.
The math is easy just the concept is confusing...
how do I find the pvalue is alpha isn't given?
You need to have the t-value, sample size, and the tail. You look at the t table what two values the value of t falls between. Depending on the tail test, you look up to the row labeled one tail and find the two alpha values Hence, the P-value would be contained in the interval of the tail values. Sorry, I can't help anymore because openstudy keeps on showing No Internet Connection and if I refresh, goes to an ERROR webpage. I hope this helps! Good luck. :)
well the number looks to between 1.313 and 1.711 so how do I figure out the true number
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!