The following is based on information from The Wolf in the Southwest: The Making of an Endangered Species by David E. Brown (University of Arizona Press). Before 1918, the proportion of female wolves in the general population of all southwestern wolves was about 50%. However, after 1918, southwestern cattle ranchers began a widespread effort to destroy wolves. In a recent sample of 34 wolves, there were only 10 females. One theory is that male wolves tend to return sooner than females to their old territories where their predecessors were exterminated. Do these data indicate that the population proportion of female wolves is now less than 50% in the region? Use a significance level of 0.05 a. (1pt) What is the question and parameter of interest? b. (2pts) State the null and alternative hypotheses. c. (2pts) Check the conditions for inference. d. (2pts) Calculate the test statistic. Show work! e. (1pts) Give the appropriate p-value and state whether it is one-sided or two-sided. f. (3pts) Calculate the appropriate 95% confidence interval. Show work! g. (4pts) Finally, using the results from parts e and f, summarize your conclusions. Interpret the CI and results of your test. Use the four part conclusion method. Include context!
The following is based on information from The Wolf in the Southwest: The Making of an Endangered Species by David E. Brown (University of Arizona Press). Before 1918, the proportion of female wolves in the general population of all southwestern wolves was about 50%. However, after 1918, southwestern cattle ranchers began a widespread effort to destroy wolves. In a recent sample of 34 wolves, there were only 10 females. One theory is that male wolves tend to return sooner than females to their old territories where their predecessors were exterminated. Do these data indicate that the population proportion of female wolves is now less than 50% in the region? Use a significance level of 0.05 a. (1pt) What is the question and parameter of interest? b. (2pts) State the null and alternative hypotheses. c. (2pts) Check the conditions for inference. d. (2pts) Calculate the test statistic. Show work! e. (1pts) Give the appropriate p-value and state whether it is one-sided or two-sided. f. (3pts) Calculate the appropriate 95% confidence interval. Show work! g. (4pts) Finally, using the results from parts e and f, summarize your conclusions. Interpret the CI and results of your test. Use the four part conclusion method. Include context!
@jim_thompson5910
I think I should be able to figure out a, b, c , and d
ok tell me what you get
Let me work on this for a bit and I will tag you
ok
@jim_thompson5910
Okay so the question is out of a pop. of 50 how many wolves are female when returning to a region?
the null: mu = 50 alternative: mu < 50 paramters: interested in population of wolves was ths ample obtained using a random mech? -No Is the pop. normal distributed or n>=30? -yes Do we know pop. standard deviation? -No
paramters would be female wolves
would theory be considered a random mech?
What question are the researchers trying to answer? This is a very specific question stated in the problem.
Do these data indicate that the population proportion of female wolves is now less than 50% in the region?
correct
the parameter is buried in the question
I am thinking...
I need to find a sample praportion? P^ = 10/34 = 0.29411
what does the sample proportion estimate?
P^ = # success / the pop.
the sample praportion
the sample proportion estimates the sample proportion?
fill in the blank the sample proportion is approximately equal to the ________
true population portion p
good
if we did a census, we could find the true population proportion p however, that's way too costly (in terms of time, money, resources, etc) so we use stats and rely on the sample proportion
so the p^ is the sample praportion and we can use the equation to find the true population portion of p? How?
parameter of interest: population proportion of female wolves statistic of interest: sample proportion of female wolves the statistic estimates the parameter
so hopefully this wraps up the question `What is the question and parameter of interest?` ?
Does the data indicate that the population proportion of female wolves is now less than 50% in the region? And population proportion of female wolves is our paramter of interest. p^ = 10/34 = 0.29411 10 being the number of female wolves and 34 being the sample population
`p^ = 10/34 = 0.29411` is the sample proportion 34 is NOT the sample proportion. It helps lead you to it though 34 is the sample size
number of female wolves in sample = 10 number of wolves in sample (male+female) = 34 sample proportion of female wolves = p-hat = 10/34
okay
so about 30%
10/34 = 0.29411764705882 so roughly 0.2941
29.41%
that will come later though and doesn't apply to part (a)
(b) `State the null and alternative hypotheses.`
H_o = 50 H_A < 50
Ho is not equal to 50 Ho is not a number, it's a symbol that stands for "null hypothesis" it makes no sense to say "the null hypothesis is 50"
use the parameter in part (a) hopefully you'll notice that the parts build on each other as you go along
The population proportion of female wolves is now less than 50% in the region
This is our claim, the null is what we are referring to a general statement
how can we shorten "population proportion" in terms of symbols?
oh...
P^ = 29.41 P^ < 29.41
but we know the value of p-hat it's 0.2941 why do we need to conduct a test on the value of p-hat?
btw 0.2941 is not the same as 29.41
tie the parameter (in symbolic form) with the question
sample praportion is a good estimator for the true population proportion P H_o: P = 0.29411 H_A: P < 0.2941
the ultimate goal is to figure out the population proportion p the null would be Ho: p = 0.50 the alternative would be Ha: p < 0.50 so we assume the null is true, we assume p = 0.50 then we test if that assumption is true or not if the p value is smaller than alpha, then we reject the null. Otherwise, we fail to reject and "accept" the null
H_o = 50 H_A < 50 my bad this was a mistake. I meant to use a mu
I guess I would have been wrong anways since I didn't use a p
H_o: mu = 50 H_A: mu < 50
`H_o: mu = 50` `H_A: mu < 50` no, I just stated the hypotheses
so when dealing with praportion i have to use a symbol p huh? I would get points knocked off if I used mu instead?
proportion
`i have to use a symbol p huh? ` yes for population proportion
Okay I will make a note on my cheat sheet of this. I am on c now.
`I would get points knocked off if I used mu instead?` yes you would and it's not because it's a trivial mistake. It leads you down the wrong path and wrong test method. So you're likely to get more points taken away for using the wrong test statistic and wrong test method
p and mu aren't just symbols as all symbols do, they represent something greater and more complex (which is why it's handy to use a convenient letter)
okay. i am looking at c now.
was the sample obtained using a random mechanism?
yes
is the pop normal distributed or n>=30?
this might help http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/members/repository/ap03_stats_assumption_31840.pdf
yes our n>=30
if you're in an AP stats class then it would be really relevant since it's from CollegeBoard (the people who make the AP curriculum)
no i am in intro to engineering stats
My instructor told us to use the 3 questions: 1. Was the sample obtained using a random mech? 2.Is the population normal distributed or n>=30? 3. Do you know population standard deviation, sigma?
alright
if I didn't have sigma I'd use the t-test , thanks for the link. I will look over it briefly while i study.
it doesn't mention SRS anywhere, but let's hope these researchers used it
I think what you stated is most of the time true in our problems. I have not really asked my instructor about these conditions. Question 2 for example he said it's a rule of thumb your n needs to be 30 or more.
1. Yes 2. Yes 3. No
yeah I think the SRS condition is so automatic that it's hardly mentioned.
I agree with your three answers to those 3 sub-questions
in #2 I would be more specific and say "yes, n >= 30"
Okay So would you have to calculate SRS in upper level stats courses?
SRS refers to simple random sample
you use a computer most likely (to be quick and efficient with the random process)
don't worry about the nitty gritty, that will come later when you're actually setting up a study
t-test? I need the sample std though
you have a proportion, which means you use a z test
i can't use the z test. i don't know sigma
do i need to use the one sample proportion z confidence interval?
have a read of this page http://stattrek.com/hypothesis-test/proportion.aspx?Tutorial=AP notice how on that page it says `Test statistic. The test statistic is a z-score (z) defined by the following equation`
it's a different kind of z test
I'll be right back
i;ve never seen that equation before...
|dw:1455159898633:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!