Help with Logarithms. MEDAL and FAN. Question below...
\[Log _{\frac{ 1 }{ 4 }}(2)=?\]
That is better!
\(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle [1]~\quad \log_a(a)=1 }\) \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle [2]~\quad \log_a(b^c)=c\times\log_a(b) }\)
If you know these properties, you should be got to go:)
I'm confused
\(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle 2=2^1=2^{(-2) \times (-1/2)} =(2^{-2})^{1/2}=\left(\frac{1}{2^2}\right)^{(-1/2)} =\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)^{(-1/2)}. }\)
So, you can use the fact that, \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle 2=\left( \frac{1}{4}\right)^{-1/2} }\) to evaluate the logarithm (using equation [2] and [1])
@zepdrix
Would it be the opposite of the other equation where the numbers are switched?
The other equation being\[Log _{2}(\frac{ 1 }{ 4 })=-2\]
Hmm this one is a little tricky to explain :) Didn't quite understand Zel's transformation of the 2? So how do you turn a 2 into a 4? By taking the square root of it, right?\[\large\rm 2=\sqrt4\]
I mean, by taking the square root of the 4*
But you would prefer to write your root as a rational exponent,\[\large\rm 2=\sqrt4=4^{1/2}\]
The furthest I understood from Zel's explanation was were 2 turned into\[\frac{ 1 }{ 2^2 }\]
Zep, all I did is wrote 2 in terms of (1/4) raised to some power. This way I can simplify by taking the exponent out of the log.
Yes, I know what you did, but he/she didn't :)
I did a mistake in step 4, a typo, the exponent should be -1/2 (not 1/2). .... Ok
Ok, 4ever, do you understand why I needed to write the 2 as (1/4) raised to some power?
I understand why the 2 needed to be turned into (1/4), but I don't understand why it needs to be raised to a power
I need to write the 2 in terms of 1/4, but I can't just replace the 2 with 1/4 (Right ?). I derived that (1/4)^(-1/2) is the same thing as 2. And so, I can use that to evaluate my logarithm.
ohh
A similar example. \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle \log_{(1/9)}(3) =\log_{(1/9)}\left[3^{(-2)\times (-1/2)}\right] = \\[0.5em] }\) \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle \log_{(1/9)}\left[\left(3^{-2}\right) ^{-1/2}\right] = \log_{(1/9)}\left[\left(\frac{1}{9}\right) ^{-1/2}\right] = }\) I can use rule [2] to get the exponent out. \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle (-1/2)\times \log_{(1/9)}\left[ \frac{1}{9}\right] = }\) Then, I can use [1] to simplify more. \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle (-1/2)\times 1= -1/2 }\)
Okay, so what do I do when I get to \[(-1/2)Log _{\frac{ 1 }{ 4 }}=\frac{ 1 }{ 4 }\]
How do I use [1] for the next step?
You mean, \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle (-1/2)\times \log_{~1/4} (1/4) }\)
Then, you know that since, \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle \log_{a} (a) =1 }\) Therefore, you also know that, \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle \log_{~1/4} (1/4) =1 }\) This way, if you had (for example) \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle 55\times \log_{~1/4} (1/4) }\) Then you would get: \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle 55\times \log_{~1/4} (1/4)=55\times (1) =55 }\) So, in your case, \(\color{#000000}{ \displaystyle (-1/2)\times \log_{~1/4} (1/4) =? }\)
(-1/2)
Yes, exactly!
negative one half :)
Thank you!
No problem:)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!