Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (kj4uts):

Are f and g inverses of each other?

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

f(x)=-24x+9; g(x)=(x-9)/-24

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

so, in order to be an inverse, what has to happen?

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

Don't you invert the function with respect to a given variable

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

f(g(x))=? and g(f(x))=?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

it's easier than that, although that is one way

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

by inverts you mean switch x and y, i guess?

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

I always though that you just have to change the + to a - like this -24x-9?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

oh, no, that is not it

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

so the inverse is a function that "undoes" the initial function

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

so by definition, f(g(x))=g(f(x))=x, if the functions are inverses

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

for example, let's find the inverse of f(x)=2-x

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

well, f(x)=y, so y=2-x Now, our inverting step is to switch the variables x=2-y Solving for y, x-2=-y y=-x+2 or 2-x. Now it appears that this function is its own inverse. Let's check f(g(x))=2-(2-x) solving we get f(g(x))=2-2+x f(g(x))=x So, since it equals what we put in, x, these are indeed inverses

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

So, try this on your problem \[f(x)=-24x+9; ~~g(x)=\frac{x-9}{-24}\]

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

So to start would the first step look like x = - 24 y + 9?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

you can do it that way. Or you could skip the solve for the inverse step and just see if f(g(x))=x

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

so whenever you solve what you have written for y, you should get g(x) if it is an inverse

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

Would that be 9-x/24

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

I wouldn't distribute the negative since they didn't for g, but pretty much

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

inverse of -24x+9 is 9-x/24?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

which is the same as their g(x) if you pull a minus 1 out of the top

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

So that would mean that the answer is no they are not inverses?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

no, they are because they are the same. What you got and g(x) are the same thing

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

now, you can just plug the two into each other to check if you are not convinced

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

oh I see because g(x)=(x-9)/-24 the inverse of that would be 9-x/24 so they are inverses.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

no no, those are the same equations

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

Oh I see now so when I plug them into each other I will see that they are inverses?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

inverse has nothing to do with changing +/- signs. Thats conjugate

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

when you plug g(x) into f(x) you will

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

ok thank you very much for your time and help :)

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

np, please check by plug and chugging g into f. That's the easier way to begin with.

OpenStudy (kj4uts):

ok I going to

OpenStudy (hwyl):

how did you get there? that is how you think of inverses 2+1 = 3 how did you get to 3 usually the parts and pieces in the equation gives you a hint how.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!