Ask your own question, for FREE!
Biology 12 Online
OpenStudy (sawq):

stuck Which of the following provides the best example of how comparative embryology supports the theory of evolution? Humans do not lay eggs as birds do, but birds produce yolk sacs instead of embryos, suggesting birds evolved later than humans. Humans have a tailbone that is visible during embryonic development, which suggests that humans evolved to depend on a useful tailbone. Humans do not have gills as fish do, but human embryos have gill slits, suggesting humans and fish share a common evolutionary ancestor. Humans have stem cells that develop in an unpredictable way, whi

OpenStudy (sawq):

anybody available to help? evolution question?

OpenStudy (sawq):

@pooja195 @nincompoop

OpenStudy (sawq):

@jigglypuff314

OpenStudy (sawq):

@Teddyiswatshecallsme

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

I think it is the third one. Hope this helps.

OpenStudy (sawq):

I thought that too at the beginning but it seems so weird and false to me that we could be related to fish :P

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

I know right. When you put in the answers let me know if I helped.

OpenStudy (sawq):

kk I will ty

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

yw

OpenStudy (alphadxg):

I would agree with the third one

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

I'm new, this is my first response I have done.

OpenStudy (alphadxg):

evolution is a iffy subjective but I agree with your guess.

OpenStudy (sawq):

thanks you two

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

Thanks

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

welcome

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

Let me know if you need any more help

OpenStudy (sawq):

yes I have another one: When Carolus Linnaeus created his classification system in the 1700s, he sorted organisms based on their physical characteristics. In 1990, Carl Woese and his colleagues introduced a new classification system that sorted organisms into three different domains. Which of the following best explains why this change occurred? Many of the organisms classified by Linnaeus are extinct, and his classification system was considered outdated. Linnaeus' classification system did not account for similar organisms being found in different geographic locations. New genetic research showed that organisms with similar characteristics were not related to each other. Organisms were discovered that belonged in more than one of Linnaeus' kingdoms, based on physical appearance.

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

This is also the third one. :P

OpenStudy (sawq):

I wasn't sure btwn third and fourth are u sure?

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

Yes I believe I am

OpenStudy (sawq):

thanks

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

Welcome

OpenStudy (alphadxg):

XD

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

I was going between those two I am sorry if you got it wrong

OpenStudy (alphadxg):

oOPs its C sorry lol

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

So it was the one I said

OpenStudy (alphadxg):

didn't scroll far enough down.

OpenStudy (carazu1867):

Oh thanks

OpenStudy (sawq):

A and B are both right? A botanist discovers a plant growing in her yard. It does not have leaves or roots, but it does have vascular tissue There are yellow sporangia growing on the green, branching stems. Which of the following is the most logical conclusion about the classification of this plant? It is a whisk fern, and belongs to the phylum Psilophyta. It is a liverwort, and belongs to the phylum Hepatophyta. It is a hornwort, and belongs to the phylum Anthocerophyta. It is a horsetail, and belongs to the phylum Sphenophyta.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!