Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ganeshie8

jabez177 (jabez177):

@terenzreignz

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

@freckles

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Any ideas on where to start?

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

all I can grab is that we are restricted to a universe of reals (is this real numbers) and then supposedly either there exists an A and exists a C such that for all B and for all D ad=bc

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, it's real numbers, and yeah that's what it's saying

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

I'm getting rusty on this. Let me process...

OpenStudy (ben00):

Make it easier

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

When you have to prove that something exists, you have to produce it; When you have to prove that something holds for all elements of a set, you have to use arbitrary elements from said set...

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Actually, never mind. Let a = c = 0 then ad = bc for all b and d in the reals. Case closed.

OpenStudy (ben00):

This student is college.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

How about it, @Angelina_Vella ? Suspiciously simple? I'm doubting myself lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It feels right, haha it's what I was thinking before, but I can't see how it could be that short.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Wanna have some fun? Let's assume none of them are zeros, maybe that will let you find some peace haha

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Haha alright

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Let b and d be nonzero real numbers. Let c = 1. Then take \[\Large a = \frac{b}{d}\] This exists because d is nonzero. Then \[\Large ad =\frac{b}{\cancel d}\cdot \cancel d = b = bc\] And the assumption holds.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ohhh I see it now

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There was another question similar to this one,

OpenStudy (anonymous):

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

This is complicated...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

First I re-wrote it as products instead of fractions by cross multiplying, then are your supposed to set each side of the equation to one?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Not that simple. Best not to mess with fractions because you'd be implicitly making assumptions by cross-multiplying. Namely, by cross multiplying, you are already assuming equality and that the denominators are nonzero

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But the only way I see how you can proving that it is true is if both sides equal 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and to prove it false they should be different or that they can never be equal

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Let me think again...

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

This was your original question, wasn't it? :P And you did the cross-multiplying and gave the question you initially posted?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No no, this is another question, sorry

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the attached image is another question

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I was just thinking the proof to this one would be similar to the one we did in the original posted question

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well "explaination"

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

For proving the first part, yes, setting them to be equal to one seems sound. For any \(\large a \in \mathbb N\), choose \(b = a\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Look at \[ad = k\] Can you find an integer \(d\) for all \(a\) ? \(k\) is fixed here.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So that for any \(\large c \in \mathbb N\), you can choose \(d = c\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm a little lost

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay, let me rephrase what I said earlier: When you have \(\forall \), then you have to taker arbitrary elements when you're proving. When you have \(\exists\), then you can choose a specific element when you're proving.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay that makes sense

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So, we move at them one at a time, starting from the left: \[\large \forall a \ \ \exists b \ \ \forall c \ \ \exists d \ \ \frac{a}{b}=\frac cd \] So...

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

\[\large \color{red}{\forall a} \ \ \exists b \ \ \forall c \ \ \exists d \ \ \frac{a}{b}=\frac cd\] Let a be an arbitrary positive integer.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

\[\large{\forall a} \ \ \color{red}{\exists b} \ \ \forall c \ \ \exists d \ \ \frac{a}{b}=\frac cd\] Let a be an arbitrary positive integer. Choose b to be equal to a.

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Can you continue this trend, @Angelina_Vella ? ^_^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

umm let c be an arbitrary positive integer that is....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

equal to b?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

No... You're right about the c part.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh okay and then let d be equal to c?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yes. Exactly. Then we demonstrate \[\large{\forall a} \ \ {\exists b} \ \ \forall c \ \ \exists d \ \ \color{blue}{\frac{a}{b}=\frac cd}\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Since a = b and c = d,\(\Large \frac a b = 1 = \frac c d\) case closed. ^_^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh haha okay :) and then to prove the other false you have to show what a/b = c/d are never equal?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Sort of. But do you know how to negate quantifiers? ^_^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well they switch to the other dont they? kind of like laws of logic and deMorgan's law?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Exactly. The almighty negation. \(\Large \neg \) We could try proving the negation of the statement \[\Large \forall a \ \ \exists d \ \ \forall c \ \ \exists b \ \ \ \ \frac a b= \frac c d\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

So here goes... \[\Large \neg \forall a \ \ \exists d \ \ \forall c \ \ \exists b \ \ \ \ \frac a b= \frac c d\] \[\Large \color{red}{ \exists a }\ \ \neg \exists d \ \ \forall c \ \ \exists b \ \ \ \ \frac a b= \frac c d\]\[\Large \color{red}{ \exists a }\ \ \color{red}{ \forall d} \ \ \neg \forall c \ \ \exists b \ \ \ \ \frac a b= \frac c d\] \[\Large \color{red}{ \exists a \ \ \forall d \ \ \exists c} \ \ \neg \exists b \ \ \ \ \frac a b= \frac c d\]\[\Large \color{red}{ \exists a \ \ \forall d \ \ \exists c \ \ \forall b} \ \ \ \ \neg\frac a b= \frac c d\]\[\Large \color{red}{ \exists a \ \ \forall d \ \ \exists c \ \ \forall b \ \ \ \ \frac a b\ne \frac c d}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That's fancy

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Only the best for you, lol Now let me think some more... Or you could do some thinking of your own XD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Haha well I never realized all you had to do was negate to make it not equal

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

But that was the easy part. Now comes the proving part. First, we have \(\Large \exists a \) We have to choose a very particular value for a. Choose wisely... :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Haha you kill me >.<

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ummm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

d? :o

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

No. See, we don't have a d, yet. We're supposed to choose a value for a, FIRST, as this \(\exists a\) came before \(\forall d\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh okay, so like we choose a number?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yeah... still thinking. Just keep bouncing your ideas off me lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so we need to have it so the values are different in the equation?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

always different

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so the main thing will probably be the last for every right?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

brb in like ten minutes. feel free to ask around lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okie

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So it's like an evil adversary problem, we have to pick variables associated with (there exists) and our evil adversary picks those associated with (for every)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@ganeshie8

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmmmmmm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah, I don't know how to finish this :/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Anyone understand what we're supposed to do to prove that a/b != c/d?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Okay... where was I? :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

need a particular value for (there exists) a

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Ahh. Pick a prime number.

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

like 2?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Prime numbers are convenient. So let's choose a = 2

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Now... let d be an arbitrary positive integer. You guys catch me so far?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

why do we choose a prime number?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Let me work out my "TJ Magic"

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

if d is an arbitrary positive integer then we're only considering the set \[Z^{+}\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Yup. So uhh @Angelina_Vella You following?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh okay makes sense

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

for example Z = { -3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3} But Z plus = [0,1,2,3] those guys count

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

fffff... forgot the ... on each side XD

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Zero is not included, Usuki-chan :P Anyway, now we come to \(\exists c\) Choose another prime number ^^

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

gomen XD

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

maybe we can keep it small like let c = 3?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Sure. And finally, we have an arbitrary positive integer, b.

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

like b = 4 ?

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

Now, we have to prove that \[\Large \frac a b \ne \frac c d\]

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

No, Usuki-chan, we have \(\forall b\) so b has to be arbitrary

terenzreignz (terenzreignz):

@Angelina_Vella Still with me?

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

oh yeah that's for all of B

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so far :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so a = 2 and c = 3?

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

so what we have so far is a = 2 c =3 and d = ? b = ? for d and b are positive integers and a =2 and c = 3 are prime numbers

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!