Question

PLEASE HELP
Who can name objections on the Miranda warning !

Answer 1

u got this or should i

Answer 2

I have no idea

Answer 3

ok

Answer 4

nikki fan me for i can pm u

Answer 5

This is the question i need to answer 2. List one or two other possible objections to giving the warnings. Explain each in detail and include your opinion on their merit.

Answer 6

can you help me?

Answer 7

yes

Answer 8

http://www.shestokas.com/constitution-and-its-people/the-origin-and-meaning-of-the-miranda-warnings/

Answer 9

go to that site

Answer 10

hm

Answer 11

I know little about the law but i cant think of any objections or anything that i can write in a paragraph

Answer 12

@jabez177 u help her

Answer 13

U.S. History... e.e

I'll do my best.

Answer 14

its American Gov but thanks so much im so lost

Answer 15

This is the Miranda Law, I think.

The Standard Miranda Warning (Miranda Rights)

Law enforcement officers carry with them a form to advise an individual being arrested:

“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to have an attorney present during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.”

Answer 16

Oh wait.

Answer 17

i like US history ;)

Answer 18

Here.

The Miranda warning, which can also be referred to as the Miranda rights, is a right to silence warning given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) before they are interrogated to preserve the admissibility of their statements against them in criminal ...
Miranda warning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning

Answer 19

Yes i understand that but im not understanding the objections of Miranda Law

Answer 20

Now we just have to think the opposite of that.

Answer 21

Objections? Meaning like if the person goes to court?

Answer 22

2. List one or two other possible objections to giving the warnings. Explain each in detail and include your opinion on their merit. this is the question i have to answer

Answer 23

Okay. Probably 1 objection will be um... Hm. This is hard...

Answer 24

I know

Answer 25

So something to subject to direct questioning. Now an objection would be the opposite or conflict...

Answer 26

Probably not direct questioning? :/ This question is hard to understand...

Answer 27

Letters: Miranda rights and wrongs
June 26, 2013
Email
Share

Re "The right to remain silent is still golden," Editorial, June 24

The Times writes that when the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda decision — which requires arrestees to be quickly informed of the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent — was handed down in 1966, conservatives objected, just as they are now after the Boston bombing suspect was read his Miranda rights.

First, I remember the debate when this issue was before the Supreme Court. The biggest and loudest objections at that time were from law enforcement. It was not a major cause for conservatives.

Second, conservatives don't object to Miranda warnings being read at all. Their concern is over Mirandizing people like the alleged Boston bomber or the accused Ft. Hood shooter — in other words, those accused, like enemy combatants, of committing acts of war against Americans.

Answer 28

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jun/26/opinion/la-le-0626-wednesday-miranda-warning-20130626

Answer 29

hmmm

Answer 30

I dont know what to write

Answer 31

This link is the one for my assignment but im so lost maybe you can read this

http://cacj.org/About/Policy-Statements/The-Necessity-of-Miranda-Warnings.aspx

Answer 32

Try and read that over and over. Sometimes I just go to the Kitchen and probably grab a Banana or something then I come back to it.

Answer 33

Ive read it over and over i dont get it

Answer 34

So you just have to write a couple sentences down, right?

Answer 35

a paragraph, wait i think this might be an objection,

The Miranda rule on the grounds that it impedes effective police work and results in the release of guilty defendants on mere technicalities. Reliable studies have shown, however, that over the past 20 years, confessions have been excluded from evidence in only a very small percentage of criminal cases and that, rather than impacting adversely on sound law enforcement, adherence to Miranda results in more professional police conduct.

Answer 36

That would be considered an objection right? I'll just sum that up in my own words.

Answer 37

Yeah.
Where'd you get that from? :P

Answer 38

or could this be too?
Law enforcement, however, in defeating the criminal, must maintain inviolate the historic liberties of the individual. To turn back the criminal, yet, by so doing, destroy the dignity of the individual, would be a hollow victory.

- See more at: http://cacj.org/About/Policy-Statements/The-Necessity-of-Miranda-Warnings.aspx#sthash.Jce6hJqi.dpuf

Answer 39

That works too but you just can't copy the paragraph, you have to make it in your own words. :P

Answer 40

LOL duh i know but i just want to make sure i have the right idea on this but thanks (:

Answer 41

You're welcome. :P
I'm sorry if I didn't give the exact exact answer because haven't fully learned about this yet. :P

Answer 42

Oh no your fine i just needed to get on the right track