Ask your own question, for FREE!
Chemistry 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://oi68.tinypic.com/33muayw.jpg

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Photon336

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I only need the delta G part. I've been trying to work it and getting myself confused. The equation for it is: I2 + H2 <--> 2HI Kc = [HI]^2/[I2][H2]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@jebonna

OpenStudy (photon336):

Yeah, interesting thing here is that the reaction is already at equilibrium

OpenStudy (photon336):

\[kc =\frac{ [HI]^2}{ [H_2][ I_2] }\]

OpenStudy (photon336):

We know that it's at equilibrium already so those concentrations will be constant. So, I think we can calculate the number of moles of HI easily. \[0.017mol~H_{2}*(\frac{ 2HI }{ H_2 }) = 0.034~moles~HI\]

OpenStudy (photon336):

since we know that the volume of the container is 1L to find the concentration is easy. it's just moL/L i.e. 0.017mol/L, for both HI and I2 now next step would be to put all the information into the formula for Kc

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Photon336 So HI= .017M and I2= .017M. H2 = .017

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Then do I put it in the prod/reactant equation? [.017]^2/[.017][.017]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Photon336 and if I do that I get 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Photon336 so is that the delta G then or do we need to do more to get it?

OpenStudy (photon336):

ok wait lol sorry we need to solve for delta G in terms of Kp

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Alright. I was confused on the delta G part.

OpenStudy (photon336):

\[\Delta G = RTln(Kp)\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

733K

OpenStudy (photon336):

@staldk3 R = 8.314 J mol K and T = 733

OpenStudy (anonymous):

delta G = 8.314(733)ln(1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you still raise it to e or keep it as ln?

OpenStudy (photon336):

\[-(8.314 J~mol^-1~K^-1)(733K)(\ln(1)) = \Delta G \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

delta G = 0

OpenStudy (photon336):

why does this make sense @staldk3 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Because it's at equilibrium

OpenStudy (photon336):

:in the problem you're told that the reaction is at equilibrium already, and you're then given the equilibrium concentrations of your products and reactants. |dw:1458072627499:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So Q=K

OpenStudy (anonymous):

which means G=0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Photon336 or should it rather be Kp=Kc

OpenStudy (photon336):

exactly, are you familiar with what Q is?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Vaguely. I know the formula for it is similar to K

OpenStudy (photon336):

well Q is basically the same as K Q is basically the ratio of the concentration of products over reactants at any time in the reaction other than equilibrium. \[\frac{ [PRODUCTS] }{ [REACTANTS] } = \frac{ [C][D] }{ [A][B] } = Q\] Q is the ratio of the concentration of the reactants and products at equilibrium \[\frac{ [PRODUCTS] }{ [REACTANTS] } = \frac{ [C][D] }{ [A][B] } = k\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That seems simple enough

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Also it's not wanting to take delta Go = 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But that's right...right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Since it's at equilibrium

OpenStudy (photon336):

what?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The delta G deg = 0, right? Since it's at equilibrium.

OpenStudy (photon336):

yep

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So the answer for c should be 0

OpenStudy (photon336):

when Q = K equilibrium was established.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Does it matter if it's delta G rxn?

OpenStudy (photon336):

yeah delta G means the delta G for the reaction

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Bleh. It keeps counting it wrong for some reason. Did we miss something?

OpenStudy (photon336):

@staldk3 what did it say for Kc?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

As in the a and b part?

OpenStudy (photon336):

first two parts

OpenStudy (anonymous):

a) Kc>1 b) Kp = Kc

OpenStudy (photon336):

Kp=Kc(RT)Δn

OpenStudy (photon336):

@aaronq @Cuanchi

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Cuanchi We are stuck on the part c

OpenStudy (photon336):

not sure why it's wrong?

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

there is a small detail deltaG = deltaGo + RT ln Q because your reaction is not at standard condition the delta G standard of the reaction deltaGo = - RT ln K

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-(8.314)(733)ln(1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Cuanchi like this?

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

K is not 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Then what's the K?

OpenStudy (photon336):

interesting.. that's the mistake I made. I assume the reaction was at equilibrium

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

it is at equilibrium but not a standard condition the temperature and the pressures of teh reactantas and products are not 273 and 1 atm or 1 molar

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So how do I need to set this up?

OpenStudy (photon336):

completely missed that!

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

I think the K is 16

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How did you get 16?

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

the problem said each molecule is 0.017 mole, that is not the concentration of each gas in the mix

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

did you count haw many molecules of HI, I2, H2 are in the figure?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes. 9HI 13 I2 and 12 H2

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

no

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

you have 9 HI, 2 of I2 and 2H2 it is hard to see in the still picture but in your animation you should be able to differentiate the Hi from I2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah. Kinda. It moves a little fast so it's still hard to see.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

[9]^2/[2][2]

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

yea but now you have to multiply each of the molecules by 0.017 mole to calculate the molarity (I think is not 16 either)

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

20.25

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wait why do you multiply by .017?

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

yes it is the same if you dont do the multiplication

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

81/4=20.25

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Mk that's what I did and I got that answer.

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

good!

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

now use that value of K in the formula for delta g standard of reaction with the value of temperature of the reaction 733 deltaGo = - RT ln K

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-8.314(733)ln(20.25)

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

getting closer?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

=-18332.18263

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

joules?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

J/mol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sorry

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

no?

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

the answer was wrong?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe I did it wrong.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-8.314(733)=-6094.162ln(20.25)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

for the ln do I need to set it to e?

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

I got the same

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The -18332.18263?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

like e ^-6094

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Cuanchi I'm confused what to do with the ln

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

you are fine I got the same answer than you 18332 J/mol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Should it be positive or negative?

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

negative

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Alright and for the sig figs is it okay to keep all of them>

OpenStudy (cuanchi):

looks like than 2-3 SF will be enough, the data in the problem has 2 or 3 SF. Just doble check the number of molecules in the figure if it is correct

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!