Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (alekos):

I have u1 = u2 = 1 and u(n+2) = u(n+1) +u(n) I need to prove that u(n) < 2^n using Maths Induction ( < means less than or equal to) @ganeshie

OpenStudy (alekos):

So far I have the following.............

OpenStudy (alekos):

Assume P(k) is true u(k) < 2^k and assume P(k+1) is also true u(k+1) < 2^k+1 Prove P(k+2) P(k) + P(k+1) => u(k) + u(k+1) < 2^k + 2^k+1 Do you think this mathematically correct so far?

OpenStudy (alekos):

Shall I keep going along these lines because I do have a proof but I don't know if it's correct

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Base case: \(u(1) = 1 \lt 2^1\) \(u(2) = 1 \lt 2^2\) Induction hypothesis : Let \(u(k)\lt 2^k\) and \(u(k-1)\lt 2^{k-1}\) for some arbitrary \(k\). Induction step : \(\begin{align} u(k+1) &=u(k) + u(k-1)\\~\\ &\lt 2^k + 2^{k-1}\\~\\ &=2^{k-1}(2+1)\\~\\ &\lt 2^{k-1}(4)\\~\\ &=2^{k+1} \end{align}\) \(\blacksquare\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Your steps are good :)

OpenStudy (alekos):

OK, that's great! That's what I needed. Thanks Ganeshie

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Np, you could also use "strong induction" here

OpenStudy (alekos):

Can you explain that?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

actually what we did is kind of strong induction only

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

we have assumed that the statement holds for u(k) and u(k-1)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

in strong induction we assume that the statement holds form u(k), u(k-1), u(k-2), .... then prove that the statement is true for u(k+1) too

OpenStudy (alekos):

OK, thanks for that extra bit of maths info.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!