I need some help with inductions pleaseee
Do you have a more specific question? (example?)
yeah, \[2^{n-1} \le n!\] @reemii
Can you recall the basic steps of the proof? how the parts of the proof are called…
I got down to the n=k+1 part and got \[2^{k} \le (k+1)! \] and my assumption is just \[2^{k-1} \le k!\]
now i'm kinda stuck
what is n?
The answer is: "use your assumption now". Your assumption and "n=k+1" reads: given that \(2^{k-1} \le k!\), I must show that \(2^k \le (k+1)!\). So, do you see why that must be true? (Hint: \(2^k = 2^{k-1+1}\)).
is n just a positive integer or is a subset of the positive integers ? it looks like it is the set of positive integers
All positive integers @freckles and yes, but i don't know where to go from there @reemii
use law of exponents
\[2^k=2^{k-1}2\] now use inductive hyp
am i working with my assumption now?
yes
so, it would be by assumption \[2^{k-1}\le k!\] \[2^{k-1+1}\le k! \] ???
you dropped the 2
\[2^{k-1+1}=\color{red}{2^{k-1}}2 \color{red}{\le ...} 2\] what should go in place of those dots ....
you also have \(k! = (k-1)!\times k\). Observe the inequality \(2^k\le k!\) using the two decompositions: \(2^k=2^{k-1}2\) and \(k!=k\times(k-1)!\). Can you conclude?
Where are you guys getting the 2 after the 2^(k-1)??
ohh nvm gotcha
we are trying to show \[2^k \le (k+1)! \\ \text{ we are starting with the \left hand side } \\ 2^{k}=2^{k+1-1}=2^{k-1+1}=2^{k-1}2 \\ \text{ we wrote } 2^k \text{ as } 2^{k-1} 2 \\ \text{ \because we know something about } 2^{k-1}\]
Okay i see. And for the RHS it's 2k! so when i write tht out (which i would do right?) it would be (2k)x(2k-1)! or would it just be 2(k)x(k-1)! ?
oh I was having trouble reading what you wrote yeah you have \[2^k=2^{k-1}2 \le k! \cdot 2 \text{ by your inductive hyp }\]
and then I think @reemii gave you a hint above somewhere on how to continue
About the (k-1)! ?
What do i do with tht extra 2 on the right side though?
You have all elements to finish. "If \(a≤b\) and \(c≤d\) and the numbers are positive, what about \(ac\) vs \(bd\)?
That makes sense but what are my 2 inequalities that i'm comparing??
remember what you are trying to show and I like to repeat this because it is important on figuring out what to do next \[2^k \le (k+1)! \text{ is what we want to show } \\ 2^k \le k! \cdot 2 \text{ is what we have so far }\]
earlier @reemii said something about k!=k*(k-1)! what does (k+1)! equal if I wanted to write it as a product of two things
just like he did with the k!
(k+1)(k)(k-1)!
that is true but a product of two things like (k+1)!=(k+1)*k!
notice we already have k! on our right hand side
But i thought i was working on the assumption and all there is is a 2k!
what do we know about comparing 2 and k+1 though
remember k is a positive integer
so what symbol can I use to compare 2 and k+1
\[\le \]
right on
Where are you getting the 2 and k+1?
so you would say the following is true right \[2^k \le k! \cdot 2 \le k! \cdot (k+1)\]
I'm trying to remember what I want to show and where I'm at to figure out what to do
for example we wanted to show \[2^k \le (k+1)! \\ \text{ or you can write this as } 2^k \le k! \cdot (k+1)\]
Ohh i see so you can go up from k? So (k+1)(k+2)! etc.. i thought you could only go down?
no no
Oh thats the other one
My bad xD
(k+1)! = k! * (k+1) not (k+1)*(k+2)!
sort of "visual" presentation of what all happened here: \[ \begin{align} 2 &\le k\\ 2^{k-1}&\le k!\\ & \downarrow\\ 2^{k-1}2&\le k(k-1)! \end{align} \]
ugh. first line should be \(2\le k+1\) and second \(2^{k-1}\le k!\).
So (k+1)!=(k+1)*(k)! (and if i were to hypothetically continue the next would be k-1 correct?)
yes
(k+1)k(k-1)! etc.
Okay so as of right now i have my "by assumption" part saying \[2^{k}\le 2k!\]
and you already said 2<=k+1
you will need that inequality as well
wait when did i say that part?
above when I asked you the following: "so what symbol can I use to compare 2 and k+1"
Oh that's the one we just came up with right?
So it's not like its stated anywhere?
it is not clearly stated anywhere it is derived from the information given
we are using that because we want to show what we have is <=(k+1)! aka <=k! * (k+1)
Okay, so then.. \[2^{k}\le 2k! \le (k+1)k!\] is that right..?
yes you used there that 2<=k+1 good job
Thanks! Then from there what do i do?
(k+1)!=(k+1)*k!
2k≤2k!≤(k+1)!
\[2^{k}=2^{k-1+1}=2^{k-1}2 \le k! \cdot 2 \le k! \cdot (k+1)=(k+1)!\] you can finally write the final sentence of your proof
therefore this proves blah blah for all positive integer n
you might not want to say blah blah
Lol xD THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!! :)
It definitely clears things up :D
yeah i do admit that was probably one of the last things I grasped when doing induction proofs you just have to have a goal and make up things that ARE TRUE to get there
Thanks!! Hopefully i can make things up that work out on my quiz :/
remember it has to be true things :p
Yes :P
Thanks again!!!
np
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!