Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 6 Online
OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

I need some help with inductions pleaseee

OpenStudy (reemii):

Do you have a more specific question? (example?)

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

yeah, \[2^{n-1} \le n!\] @reemii

OpenStudy (reemii):

Can you recall the basic steps of the proof? how the parts of the proof are called…

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

I got down to the n=k+1 part and got \[2^{k} \le (k+1)! \] and my assumption is just \[2^{k-1} \le k!\]

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

now i'm kinda stuck

OpenStudy (freckles):

what is n?

OpenStudy (reemii):

The answer is: "use your assumption now". Your assumption and "n=k+1" reads: given that \(2^{k-1} \le k!\), I must show that \(2^k \le (k+1)!\). So, do you see why that must be true? (Hint: \(2^k = 2^{k-1+1}\)).

OpenStudy (freckles):

is n just a positive integer or is a subset of the positive integers ? it looks like it is the set of positive integers

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

All positive integers @freckles and yes, but i don't know where to go from there @reemii

OpenStudy (freckles):

use law of exponents

OpenStudy (freckles):

\[2^k=2^{k-1}2\] now use inductive hyp

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

am i working with my assumption now?

OpenStudy (freckles):

yes

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

so, it would be by assumption \[2^{k-1}\le k!\] \[2^{k-1+1}\le k! \] ???

OpenStudy (freckles):

you dropped the 2

OpenStudy (freckles):

\[2^{k-1+1}=\color{red}{2^{k-1}}2 \color{red}{\le ...} 2\] what should go in place of those dots ....

OpenStudy (reemii):

you also have \(k! = (k-1)!\times k\). Observe the inequality \(2^k\le k!\) using the two decompositions: \(2^k=2^{k-1}2\) and \(k!=k\times(k-1)!\). Can you conclude?

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Where are you guys getting the 2 after the 2^(k-1)??

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

ohh nvm gotcha

OpenStudy (freckles):

we are trying to show \[2^k \le (k+1)! \\ \text{ we are starting with the \left hand side } \\ 2^{k}=2^{k+1-1}=2^{k-1+1}=2^{k-1}2 \\ \text{ we wrote } 2^k \text{ as } 2^{k-1} 2 \\ \text{ \because we know something about } 2^{k-1}\]

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Okay i see. And for the RHS it's 2k! so when i write tht out (which i would do right?) it would be (2k)x(2k-1)! or would it just be 2(k)x(k-1)! ?

OpenStudy (freckles):

oh I was having trouble reading what you wrote yeah you have \[2^k=2^{k-1}2 \le k! \cdot 2 \text{ by your inductive hyp }\]

OpenStudy (freckles):

and then I think @reemii gave you a hint above somewhere on how to continue

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

About the (k-1)! ?

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

What do i do with tht extra 2 on the right side though?

OpenStudy (reemii):

You have all elements to finish. "If \(a≤b\) and \(c≤d\) and the numbers are positive, what about \(ac\) vs \(bd\)?

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

That makes sense but what are my 2 inequalities that i'm comparing??

OpenStudy (freckles):

remember what you are trying to show and I like to repeat this because it is important on figuring out what to do next \[2^k \le (k+1)! \text{ is what we want to show } \\ 2^k \le k! \cdot 2 \text{ is what we have so far }\]

OpenStudy (freckles):

earlier @reemii said something about k!=k*(k-1)! what does (k+1)! equal if I wanted to write it as a product of two things

OpenStudy (freckles):

just like he did with the k!

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

(k+1)(k)(k-1)!

OpenStudy (freckles):

that is true but a product of two things like (k+1)!=(k+1)*k!

OpenStudy (freckles):

notice we already have k! on our right hand side

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

But i thought i was working on the assumption and all there is is a 2k!

OpenStudy (freckles):

what do we know about comparing 2 and k+1 though

OpenStudy (freckles):

remember k is a positive integer

OpenStudy (freckles):

so what symbol can I use to compare 2 and k+1

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

\[\le \]

OpenStudy (freckles):

right on

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Where are you getting the 2 and k+1?

OpenStudy (freckles):

so you would say the following is true right \[2^k \le k! \cdot 2 \le k! \cdot (k+1)\]

OpenStudy (freckles):

I'm trying to remember what I want to show and where I'm at to figure out what to do

OpenStudy (freckles):

for example we wanted to show \[2^k \le (k+1)! \\ \text{ or you can write this as } 2^k \le k! \cdot (k+1)\]

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Ohh i see so you can go up from k? So (k+1)(k+2)! etc.. i thought you could only go down?

OpenStudy (freckles):

no no

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Oh thats the other one

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

My bad xD

OpenStudy (freckles):

(k+1)! = k! * (k+1) not (k+1)*(k+2)!

OpenStudy (reemii):

sort of "visual" presentation of what all happened here: \[ \begin{align} 2 &\le k\\ 2^{k-1}&\le k!\\ & \downarrow\\ 2^{k-1}2&\le k(k-1)! \end{align} \]

OpenStudy (reemii):

ugh. first line should be \(2\le k+1\) and second \(2^{k-1}\le k!\).

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

So (k+1)!=(k+1)*(k)! (and if i were to hypothetically continue the next would be k-1 correct?)

OpenStudy (reemii):

yes

OpenStudy (reemii):

(k+1)k(k-1)! etc.

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Okay so as of right now i have my "by assumption" part saying \[2^{k}\le 2k!\]

OpenStudy (freckles):

and you already said 2<=k+1

OpenStudy (freckles):

you will need that inequality as well

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

wait when did i say that part?

OpenStudy (freckles):

above when I asked you the following: "so what symbol can I use to compare 2 and k+1"

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Oh that's the one we just came up with right?

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

So it's not like its stated anywhere?

OpenStudy (freckles):

it is not clearly stated anywhere it is derived from the information given

OpenStudy (freckles):

we are using that because we want to show what we have is <=(k+1)! aka <=k! * (k+1)

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Okay, so then.. \[2^{k}\le 2k! \le (k+1)k!\] is that right..?

OpenStudy (freckles):

yes you used there that 2<=k+1 good job

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Thanks! Then from there what do i do?

OpenStudy (freckles):

(k+1)!=(k+1)*k!

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

2k≤2k!≤(k+1)!

OpenStudy (freckles):

\[2^{k}=2^{k-1+1}=2^{k-1}2 \le k! \cdot 2 \le k! \cdot (k+1)=(k+1)!\] you can finally write the final sentence of your proof

OpenStudy (freckles):

therefore this proves blah blah for all positive integer n

OpenStudy (freckles):

you might not want to say blah blah

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Lol xD THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!! :)

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

It definitely clears things up :D

OpenStudy (freckles):

yeah i do admit that was probably one of the last things I grasped when doing induction proofs you just have to have a goal and make up things that ARE TRUE to get there

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Thanks!! Hopefully i can make things up that work out on my quiz :/

OpenStudy (freckles):

remember it has to be true things :p

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Yes :P

OpenStudy (thatonegirl_):

Thanks again!!!

OpenStudy (freckles):

np

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!