The Integral of (ln(x))^x dx seems easy enough but to express it indefinitely?
Isn't it ln(x^x)dx ...
could you provide some context of this problem ?
Might just be a coincidence, but I noticed these graphs seem to be approximately the same: \[(\ln x)^x \approx e^{x-e}\] https://www.desmos.com/calculator/dsxiahpiw6 Of course one of these is much easier to integrate than the other, so it would be nice if there was some definite relationship between the two.
Shouldn't it be in(x^x)dx @daniel.ohearn1
We can use a property of logarithms xln(x)dx we pull down the exponent
any ideas about how to integrate xln(x) ?
so we need to assign u and dv... what could we let u be ?
If it is (lnx)^x, then note that (lnx)^x=e^(x*ln(lnx))
Yes, I agree with that.
Something tells me the integral of (ln x)^x is not "easy enough": http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+of+%28ln+%28x%29%29%5Ex&x=0&y=0
No it isn't ln(x^x) nor is it "impossible". But it could be unique, and there could be a umbrella function for it..
It's convincing enough for me :P
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!