Rational number question
If I give you a rational number reduced to lowest terms, \[n=\frac{a}{b}\] and I don't tell you what a and b are, is it possible just using n alone to find an expression \(f(n)\) for \[f(n)=a+b\]
Your notation suggests that \(f\) is a function. By definition of function, it must satisfy : \[p=q\implies f(p) = f(q)\]
Easy to find a counterexample let p = 1/2, q = 2/4
I don't think that's fair since n is always known to be reduced to lowest terms
Oh wait, then it requires some thinking...
then \[f(1/2) = f(2/4)\]
you should be able to use the first equation to solve for a and b in terms of n substitute those into the second equation' and then, if we're lucky there might be a way to get rid of a and b altogether so we have just an equations containing n
if a is 1 and b is 3 then...
@Joshtray f(2/4) is invalid since \(n \ne \frac{2}{4}\) Maybe this helps, this is always true: \[\gcd(a,b)=1\]
but n can be 1/3
alright, I can see how you might get an expression for f(n) in terms of n, a, and b
but as far as getting rid of a and b, I'm not sure what they would be looking for there
f(a/b) = a+b
you're going backwards to the direction you're supposed to go to m8 @Joshtray
if n = a/b, then a = bn, and b = a/n
yeah
are you inputting n in decimal form ?
so take the second equation, and replace a with bn, and replace b with a/n
n right now is an unknown rational number
so no, we're not using any decimals at this point @ganeshie8
that is bn + a/n
just trying to get an expression for f(n) that includes n
and yes correct @Joshtray
and then you could combine that into one rational expression
|dw:1459246148374:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!