x belongs to R is a zero divisor iff det x=0
det x suggests that x is a matrix? But R is the set of real numbers right? So... I'm confused by your question. Can you please clarify?
here R is a ring
\(a\) is a left zero divisor if \(ax=0\) for some \(x\). Unless I am confusing something, det(x) refers to the determinant of a matrix x. I don't even understand now...
For some \(x\neq0\) that is.
i wanted to ask the same thing :P Perhaps you are considering some sort of vector space over R?
Maybe he is considering the ring of matrices! That would make sense right?
yup
This can be proved using rank-nullity theorem. I am too lazy so I will leave this to you lol.
XD Thxs
consider M2(R) for example
Lol, i will give just a very very general sketch idea of why. If you want a proper rigorous answer, ask again. :P So basically, if x is a zero divisor then there exists a matrix A such that xA=0 or Ax=0. Then it follows that the columns/rows (corresponding to whether x is a left or right zero divisor) of A are in the nullspace of x. As the nullspace of x is not {0}, it is singular and therefore det(x)=0. On the other hand if det(x)=0. Then its nullspace is not equal to {0}. Thus there must be a v in the nullspace. Let a matrix A be the matrix such that it has v in its first column and 0 in all the other entries. Then xA=0 and so x is a zero divisor.
thanks
It is pretty rigorous IMO since it follows directly from rank-nullity theorem.
lol, it didn't start off rigorous, but then the rigor kinda materialised haha
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!