Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (dontknowdontcare):

Math help for medal!!

OpenStudy (dontknowdontcare):

If h(x)= x^2-3x and g(x)=2x+4 find (h of g)(x)

OpenStudy (mathmale):

First of all: Have you done other problems of this kind before? If so, what have you learned from them that you could apply here?

satellite73 (satellite73):

step one in computing \[h\circ g(x)\] is to get rid of the circle notation and write is as \[h(g(x))\]

satellite73 (satellite73):

step two is to replace the general \(g(x)\) by the specific one you have so step two is \[h(2x+4)\]

satellite73 (satellite73):

step 3 since \[h(\spadesuit)=\spadesuit^3-3\spadesuit\] then \[h(2x+4)=(2x+4)^2-3(2x+4)\]

satellite73 (satellite73):

step 4 is to do the algebra multiply out, combine like terms

OpenStudy (dontknowdontcare):

so far I have 4x^2+8x+8x+16-6x+12 and then I subtracted the 6x from the second 8x and added the 12 to the 16 leaving me with; 4x^2+8x+2x+28 then I grouped and now have 4x(x+2) 2(x+14) which I know isnt correct because they have to be the same...where did I mess up?

satellite73 (satellite73):

you didn't distribute the minus sign

satellite73 (satellite73):

\[ 4x^2+8x+8x+16-6x+12 \]should be \[ 4x^2+8x+8x+16-6x-12 \]

satellite73 (satellite73):

in other words \[-3(2x+4)=-3x-12\] it is a common mistake (how i found it right away)

OpenStudy (dontknowdontcare):

thanks!

OpenStudy (dontknowdontcare):

so should the equation leave off with -3x-12, or should I simplify it by grouping?

OpenStudy (mathmale):

Any valid simplification is worth doing.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!