Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 22 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Prove or Disprove: −N := {z ∈Z : −z ∈N} has the Upper Well Ordering Property.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A set of numbers has the Upper Well Ordering Property if and only if every non empty subset has a greatest element.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i know that N has a least element

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think is wrong because N is infinite so doesn't have a greatest element. is that right?

OpenStudy (thomas5267):

I would say yes because you are dealing with the negative numbers not the naturals. Clearly all negative numbers are bouded above by 0 and the situation is analogous to natural numbers bounded below by 0 (or 1 depending on definition).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i see your point!

OpenStudy (bobo-i-bo):

It does have the upper well ordering property. Let \( A \subset -N\). Then consider \(-A=\{-a:a \in A\} \). By the (lower?) well ordering property of N, -A has a least element, and so the negative of that least element is the greatest element of A. As A is arbitary, any subset of -N has a greatest element and so -N has the upper well ordering property

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i'm a little confuse!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it has upper well ordering property or not? because you said in the beginning no and in the end yes!

OpenStudy (bobo-i-bo):

Umm, i said it does have the upper well ordering property in the beginning and at the end.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!