Question, doubt
the red part
please explain.
@wolf1728 @ParthKohli @phi
@ganeshie8
ya tell me
When several elements are alike and we attempt to rearrange them , the resulting permutation does not change a bit. Say, we have , \(A\) \(A\) \(B\) \(E\) \(C\) \(A\) \(D\) \(7\) letters, but \(3\) of them are same ( \(A\) ) . Note that, when we swap \(2\) \(A's\) , there's no change at all. Thus, for each of the \(3!\) permutations of the \(3\) \(A\;s\) , we'd get the same arrangement. Thus, which was previously \(7!\) is now \(\frac{7!}{3!}\) . It would be easier to visualize with this example - \(A\) \(A\) \(B\) \(.....(1)\) Consider this parallel to - \(A\) \(B\) \(C\) We'd permute \( (1) \) - \(A\) \(A\) \(B\) \(A\) \(B\) \(A\) \(B\) \(A\) \(A\) Note that, in each case, we could have swapped the \(A \; s\) ( \(2!\) ), which we would have done in case of \(A\;\;\;B\;\;\;C\) . Thus, we have to divide \(3!\) by \(2!\) , since there are \(2!\) abundant cases opposite to each cases.
wow, nice @Shouborno
Just check if my concept is going right way or not
If A B B C A A B then
its \[\frac{7!}{3!3! }\]
@Shouborno @Shouborno
@Qwertty123 @Wolfman77 @Wolfboy
@wolf1728
@hartnn Please help me in this, am I going in the right direction?
yes, thats correct :) MISSISSIPPI is a classic example!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!