Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 10 Online
jagr2713 (jagr2713):

Partial Fractions Decomposition

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

\[\frac{ x ^{2}+2x+3 }{ (x+1)(x ^{2}+2x+4) }\] \[x ^{2}+2x+3 = Ax ^{2}+Bx ^{2}+2ax+4a+bx+cx+c\]

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

So would it be a+b =1 2x+4=1 b+c=1 c=0 @agent0smith

OpenStudy (zale101):

\(x ^{2}+2x+3 = Ax ^{2}+Bx ^{2}+2ax+4a+bx+cx+c\) \((1)x ^{2}+(2)x+(3) = (Ax ^{2}+Bx ^{2})+(2ax+bx+cx)+(4a+c)\) \((1)x ^{2}+(2)x+(3) = (A+B)x ^{2}+(2a+b+c)x+(4a+c)\) 1=A+B 2=2a+b+c 3=4a+c

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

Thanks @Zale101

OpenStudy (zale101):

No problem!

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

1=A+B 2=2a+b+c 3=4a+c Solve the top equation for B in terms of A Solve the bottom for C in terms of A. Plug into the middle equation to find A.

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

I mean i multiplied the top by -2

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

0=-b+c so now we plug it in to the 3rd one

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Why not do what I said in the last post...

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

1. top equals B=-A what do you mean by 2

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

No it doesn't. 1=A+B <=== solve for B 2=2a+b+c 3=4a+c <=== solve for c

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

i forgot the plus 1 lol

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

i got 2/3

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

so b would be 1/3

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Now you can find the others, first A then C.

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

A=2/3 b=1/3 c=1/3

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

This is a reason why you dont take chem and calc together for 6weeks lol Thanks for the help @agent0smith cleared it up for me :D

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

I think it might have been faster to use the way i suggested last night, plugging in numbers for x should always be the first priority

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

But that doesn't always work though

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

But always look for it first.\[\large \frac{ x ^{2}+2x+3 }{ (x+1)(x ^{2}+2x+4) } = \frac{ A }{x+1 }+\frac{ Bx+C }{x^2+2x+4 }\] \[\large x^{2}+2x+3= A(x^2+2x+4) + (Bx+C)(x+1)\] Plugging in x=-1 immediately yields A. Giving a system of two equations instead of 3.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Then plugging in x=0 gets you C...

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Then just plug in any random value of x to find B. No systems of equations needed.

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

do you think 0 would work

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

If you plug in x=-1 you can find A. Then knowing A, if you plug in x=0, you can find C. Then plug in any other value of x (not 0 or -1) to find B, I'd use x=1 for simplicity.

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

c =4a-3

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

Ill probably stick to the first one and use this one when its usable llol

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Well you were supposed to find A before trying to find C :P You just have to eyeball the equation and see if there's any x's you can plug in that eliminate any of the unknowns. It'll often save you lots of time... I used to hate partial fractions till I discovered this method.

jagr2713 (jagr2713):

Yea i learned this in highschool but forgot everything lol thanks for the tip

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!