Lets say an object X is moving in a circle. At an instant t1, (lets say when parallel to the horizontal bench) it has a velocity v. At another instant t2, after being deviated by 90 degrees the velocity remain unchanged. My confusion arises with the components. Horizontal Component At t1: v Horizontal Component At t2: 0 Vertical Component At t1: 0 Vertical Component At t2: v My question is how is the horizontal component decreases to 0, even though it's not necessary that the resultant centripetal acceleration has a component opposite to the horizontal velocity?
@ganeshie8
@ParthKohli
yes, it is necessary that your centripetal acceleration has a component in the direction of horizontal velocity
|dw:1466195675145:dw|
In this example you can see the horizontal component has decreased even though the acceleration wasn't having any component opposite to horizontal velocity
are you sure?
There's a problem with the wording of the question. On a circle, if the displacement has changed by 90°, then velocity must also hav turned 90°, so it cannot "remain unchanged". Do you mean "speed" and not "velocity"?
It is common sense, the object's velocity will remain tangential to the circle and equal in magnitude, So as soon as it gets a vertical component the horizontal component will decrease
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Vincent-Lyon.Fr There's a problem with the wording of the question. On a circle, if the displacement has changed by 90°, then velocity must also hav turned 90°, so it cannot "remain unchanged". Do you mean "speed" and not "velocity"? \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) Apologies for that. I meant the magnitude of velocity remains unchanged
But the centripetal acceleration DOES have a horizontal component to the left!
|dw:1466196199775:dw|
Oh yeah got it
Foolish of me to ask such a simple thing
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!