Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 18 Online
OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

Can someone explain it? work through it with me. http://imgur.com/7zoYyBB

OpenStudy (mjdennis):

Wow. Have you done any of it so far?

OpenStudy (mjdennis):

Start with (a): you will be trying to get rid of the variable t, by doing operations on y=3*cos(t) and x=9*sin(2*t) You will need the help of some trigonometric identities. Know anyplace to find them? we need one that will express sin(2*t) with a function of t (I think)

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

@mjdennis I don't think it requires changing the Parametric equation to Cartesian equation. If that's what u r trying to say.

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

because the parametric equation can be integrated easily as well.

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

what I don't understand is that the area under the graph above x-axis is positive and below x-axis is negative when found using integrals. but the graph is symmetrical below and above x-axis. Wouldn't the definite integral in that period be zero? instead of the shaded region.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

@HollowDensity it does; read the question. Part a.

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

yea. sorry for part a. it does. but i'm having trouble with Part b

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

You can probably use your answer from part a first, to find the area...

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

\[y^2 = 4x^2(9-x^2)\]

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

That makes b) really easy.

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

that is the cartesian, i found.

OpenStudy (mjdennis):

Yes, in (b) we will go back to parametric. In (a) it pretty clearly says "Find the Cartesian equation..." if you do not want to solve that part, say so.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Use the rectangular form for part b. It's a simple substitution integral.

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

@mjdennis Yea Sorry, my bad about that. i was looking particularly for part b

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

@agent0smith ??. i dont understand. did u look at the graph? "what I don't understand is that the area under the graph above x-axis is positive and below x-axis is negative when found using integrals. but the graph is symmetrical below and above x-axis. Wouldn't the definite integral in that period be zero? instead of the shaded region."

OpenStudy (mjdennis):

I am too slow answering today. @agent0smith better here.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

\[y = \sqrt{4x^2(9-x^2)}\] you only need the area in the first quadrant. Use the positive square root \[\large \int\limits_{0}^{?}2x \sqrt{9-x^2}\]

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

yea that makes some sense now. wait let me try it. But the required answer should be in specified form.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Once you have that value (the upper limit looks like pi/2 btw, and i guess i forgot dx lol) then you can equate it to \[A \int\limits_{0}^{\pi/2}\sin 2t \sin t dt\] and use an identity for sin2t to make this into an easy integral, too.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Oh yeah you can demonstrate b) pretty easily just by using integrals of parametric equations http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/ParaArea.aspx

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

i saw it in solution manual and this is how they did it. http://imgur.com/xru3Aui

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Yeah, see the link above. It's pretty easy really.

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

but it again confuses me. because that would give sum of area above and below x-axis

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

The definite integral because of how its defined

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

No, 0 to pi would give the area above and below, wouldn't it? All you need to look at on that link is: http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/ParaArea_files/eq0001MP.gif and http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/ParaArea_files/eq0013MP.gif

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

okay let me take a look

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

i took a look. i can do this. its integration of parametric equation.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Just looking at the graph, and knowing the graph shows from 0 to 2pi, should tell you that each "quarter" of the graph is equal to a time period of pi/2.

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

@agent0smith bulls-eye, that last line just dissolved the confusion. thanks a lot

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Heh, you're welcome. I didn't bother looking at the equations and trying to do math to figure out when the curve first touches the x-axis. Sometimes being lazy saves time.

OpenStudy (hollowdensity):

ikr

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!