Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Help with this <,

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Scientists use naturally occurring radioactive isotopes to determine the age of fossils and rocks. Radioactive elements are unstable. Over time, they decay and form new elements. The rate of this decay is characteristic for each isotope and is called the half-life of the isotope. A half-life is the amount of time it takes for half of the radioactive atoms to decay. Using the known half-life for the isotope, scientists can compare the amount of isotope present to the amount of decay product present and use this ratio to determine the age of the sample being studied.

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

1. How many half-lives would elapse be in 60,000 years?

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Umm half of 60000 right

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

What percent would it be

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Oh it is 0.07%

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

4200?

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

First: what is the half life of carbon 14? Use that to find... How many half-lives would elapse be in 60,000 years?

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

6000

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Use units. 6000 years. How many half-lives would elapse be in 60,000 years?

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

10

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Yep, now to find explain the answer, they probably want you to find how much carbon 14 would be left. So find (1/2)^10

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

0.00097

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Sorry I was stuck doing something I'm back

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

So that's probably what they want you to use. I'd convert that number to a %. Then you can describe that after more 60,000 years, there is less than that % of carbon 14 left.

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

0.097%

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

well is this for #1

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Yes but that isn't the answer. They want you to explain.

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Okay, well I need to explain how I got the answer

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

I mean do I explain the way I got the answer

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

I kinda explained it in my last post.

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Last post? you mean above right?

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Yes where i described it

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

I'd guess that's why it's ineffective, cos there's too small of an amount of carbon 14 left

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Okay now on number 2 :)

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

Since the potassium has a much longer half life, it can be used to date much older objects than carbon

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

And disadvantage

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

It can't date recent objects for the same reason, half life is too long

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Okay so for number 2 part b?

zarkam21 (zarkam21):

Would it be because this potassium would be found in living objects and would be easier to trace

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

I think by living organisms they mean ones of animals that still exist. Which would mean the fossils aren't very old... see last post.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!