Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 21 Online
OpenStudy (rahulmr):

Given\[f(x)=e ^{-x}(x-1)\]. (a) find f'(x). (b) use your result from (a) to find \[\int\limits xe^{-x}\] Help please. I have done part (a) but don't know what to do in part (b). Can anyone help me please. Thanks.

OpenStudy (rahulmr):

this is what i got for part (a) \[2e^{-x}-e^{-x}x\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Your derivative looks good. And of course we could solve this integral using Integration-by-parts. But that's not what they want here... I'm trying to see how they're connecting these two things together... If you factor your expression, it might become a little more clear, \(\large\rm -e^{-x}(x-2)\)

OpenStudy (rahulmr):

hmm.....what do you think i should i do?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Well notice what happened, you lost another 1 from your x, and also the sign changed. Interesting to note, if you took another derivative, you would get,\[\large\rm e^{-x}(x-3)\]Losing another 1 from the x, and the sign changes again, ya?

OpenStudy (legomyego180):

what a weird question

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Note: Derivative is causing us to `lose 1` each time. So integration will cause us to `gain 1`, ya? So if we start with this,\[\large\rm e^{-x}(x-0)\](which is what our expression is) do you see how we can apply this pattern?

OpenStudy (rahulmr):

yes.

OpenStudy (rahulmr):

but i'm not sure how this will relate to the (b)

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Differentation causes us to `lose 1` and `sign change`. So Integration should cause us to `gain 1` and `sign change`.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Example, if we started with \(\large\rm -e^{-x}(x-7)\) Integrating should give us \(\large\rm e^{-x}(x-6)\)

OpenStudy (rahulmr):

Oh, Now i get it.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So what do you end up with after integrating? :)

OpenStudy (rahulmr):

\[(-x-1)e^{-x}\]

OpenStudy (rahulmr):

is it correct ?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

I'm not sure why you wrote it like that... that's kinda confusing given the pattern we were trying to follow. hmm :p

zepdrix (zepdrix):

In part b, they gave us this,\[\large\rm \int\limits e^{-x}(x-0)dx\]So we'll change the sign, and add 1 to our x,\[\large\rm -e^{-x}(x+1)\]Which yes, is equivalent to your expression. I just don't understand why yours looks like that. Is it from an answer key or something? +_+

OpenStudy (rahulmr):

sorry. did you meant like this \[-e^{-x}(x+1)\]

OpenStudy (rahulmr):

Thanks a lot for the help @zepdrix

zepdrix (zepdrix):

yay team \c:/

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!