Given\[f(x)=e ^{-x}(x-1)\]. (a) find f'(x). (b) use your result from (a) to find \[\int\limits xe^{-x}\] Help please. I have done part (a) but don't know what to do in part (b). Can anyone help me please. Thanks.
this is what i got for part (a) \[2e^{-x}-e^{-x}x\]
Your derivative looks good. And of course we could solve this integral using Integration-by-parts. But that's not what they want here... I'm trying to see how they're connecting these two things together... If you factor your expression, it might become a little more clear, \(\large\rm -e^{-x}(x-2)\)
hmm.....what do you think i should i do?
Well notice what happened, you lost another 1 from your x, and also the sign changed. Interesting to note, if you took another derivative, you would get,\[\large\rm e^{-x}(x-3)\]Losing another 1 from the x, and the sign changes again, ya?
what a weird question
Note: Derivative is causing us to `lose 1` each time. So integration will cause us to `gain 1`, ya? So if we start with this,\[\large\rm e^{-x}(x-0)\](which is what our expression is) do you see how we can apply this pattern?
yes.
but i'm not sure how this will relate to the (b)
Differentation causes us to `lose 1` and `sign change`. So Integration should cause us to `gain 1` and `sign change`.
Example, if we started with \(\large\rm -e^{-x}(x-7)\) Integrating should give us \(\large\rm e^{-x}(x-6)\)
Oh, Now i get it.
So what do you end up with after integrating? :)
\[(-x-1)e^{-x}\]
is it correct ?
I'm not sure why you wrote it like that... that's kinda confusing given the pattern we were trying to follow. hmm :p
In part b, they gave us this,\[\large\rm \int\limits e^{-x}(x-0)dx\]So we'll change the sign, and add 1 to our x,\[\large\rm -e^{-x}(x+1)\]Which yes, is equivalent to your expression. I just don't understand why yours looks like that. Is it from an answer key or something? +_+
sorry. did you meant like this \[-e^{-x}(x+1)\]
Thanks a lot for the help @zepdrix
yay team \c:/
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!