Need help with statements and reasons in making proofs. MEDAL!!!
|dw:1467935158990:dw|
Given: \[m\angle4 + m\angle6 = 180\] Prove: \[m\angle 5 = m\angle 6\]
1) m<4 + m< 6 = 180 (Given) 2) m<4 + m<5 = 180
I am stuck with what reason I should give for #2
4 and 5 are complementary
Yes!
And then 3) m<4 + m<5 = m<4 + m<6
Is there a certain property for this?
@math&ing001 @agent0smith
not enough info to prove angle 5 equals angle 6.
oh wait... never mind. I read wrong
m<4 + m<5 = m<4 + m<6 by transitive property
You beat me to it @shawn :)
@math&ing001 hehe :p
How?
the transitive property states that if a = b, b = c, then a = c.
But how does it show it in this case?
m<4 + m<5 = 180, and 180 = m<4 + m<6, then m<4 + m<5 = m<4 + m<6 just let m<4 + m<5 = a, 180 = b, and m<4 + m<6 = c for an analogy
oh okay. and M<4 = m<4 \(\rightarrow\) reflexive property and then m<5 = m< 6 (substitution prop.?)
no, it's the cancellation law
we didn't learn the cancellation law
you're basically subtract m<4 from both sides in the equation m<4 + m<5 = m<4 + m<6
it's the basic ones we learned
it's either the reflexive, transitive, symmetric or substitution property i think
none of those properties above can be used to go from m<4 + m<5 = m<4 + m<6 to m<5 = m<6.
you can start with m<4 and show it equals m<5 but you need to use additive inverse property, and it's not on your list
what about the addition, subtraction , division, multiplication properties?
Use subtraction -m<4
OK.
Thanks for the help :)
Welcome =)
subtraction is the same as cancellation law :/
I guessed I should have said subtraction
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!