problem
@mathmate
I have to review a little on the square and rectangular bars. I don't do that often.
I think I know how to solve each of these.
so we would use tau = Tc/J?
I remember they are not super complicated, it's just there's warping, so equations are different.
lets just do the first one. I am sure I can figure out the second one and third one.
What if we work separately, and compare notes. ok we'll do the first one.
J is going to be different for the 2 and 3 one because they are both squares.
tau_allowed = T*c/J then we solve for c and multiply by 2 to get diameter?
exactly!
okay cool well we can compare notes tomorrow. I will finish it tonight. What time will you be around tomorrow?
You going to be around in the morning?
I will be on and off all day, so far. The best is post what you have, and I will post what I have whenever I get it done. For discussions (probably not necessary), we'll see then.
okay sounds good.
I have <3" for the first one, but will compare the exact value tomorrow.
sounds good, take care.
tc you too!
@mathmate my answers are: B1 = 0.1095in B2 = 1.165in B3 = 0.924in Brb going to eat some breakfast.
Are you there?
I am, but I have to go. Here are mine: (a) b=1.10335 (b) b=1.08235 (using alpha=0.208, according to Popov). (c) b=0.81233 (using alpha=0.231, ditto). I'll let you check that out in the mean time.
okay thanks.
what did you use for J in first one?
what was c? I used 1/2b
Yep, for (a), I did T*(b/2)/J=tau where J=pi b^4/32 solving for b gives b=(16T/(pi*tau))^(1/3) =(16*2.4/(pi*9.1))^(1/3) =1.10335
that is weird I got that answer now.
so for the second one I used J = 1/12*b*b^3 and used c = 1/2*b
|dw:1468347042260:dw|
For the third one I used c = 1/2*b and J = 1/12*2*b*b^3. What did you use? I might heading out but will return later this evening.
I am eating something I will be checking back regularly.
k i am here
so what is up? what did you use for J?
popov and ditto?
For the second and third one, I use parameters set out by Popov: \(\tau_{max}=\frac{T}{\alpha bc^2}\) for different values of b and c where \(\alpha = 0.208\) for b/c=1 \(\alpha =0.246\) for b/c=2 b/c=2 means b=2c in the above equation. Note that question defines dimesions as b*2b, and in the equation, we use b*2c, or 2c*c. So if we solve for "c", it's equivalent to "b" in the given question. Egor P. Popov, Mechanics of Materials, second SI edition. (c) 1976.
The reason that parameters are required is because with a non-circular section, the section does NOT remain plane (warping), which makes it a very complicated analysis. Popov gave the empirical values above to enable engineers to move on with the daily routines without having to study a highly complex analysis.
By the way, alpha ranges from 0.208 for a square section to 0.246 for b/c=2.0, 0.299 for b/c=6, and 0.333 for b/c=inf.
"ditto" is short for "as above".
okay, I didn't know that and didn't know anything about popov lol
I don't know what is going on here.
Perhaps your Mech. of Materials book would have a similar table.
let me look.
would something like this be in the appendices?
If you use the Beer and Johnson book, it should be there somewhere.
we don't use that textbook. We uses Philpot 3rd edition. My textbook is online too through the wileyplus site.
I can't find it anywhere. I will email my instructor this problem. I have one more under torsion problem I'd like to discuss. I have a solution.
tau_max = Tc/J = T(1/2D)/pi/32*D^4 A_median = (D)*(2D) = 2D^2 tau_max for the square = T/2At = T/4D^2t set them equal and solve for t, thickness
t = D*pi/64
ok, that's the next section on Popov, shear on thin-walled sections. lol
Ohhh I remember this graph now.
I forgot how to use it though. lol
So you can now finish (b) and (c) and see if we agree on numbers. gtg, but will check a little later before I disappear for the day! lol
okay sounds good.
For the second and third one, I use parameters set out by Popov: τmax=Tαbc2 for different values of b and c where α=0.208 for b/c=1 α=0.246 for b/c=2 b/c=2 means b=2c in the above equation. Note that question defines dimesions as b*2b, and in the equation, we use b*2c, or 2c*c. So if we solve for "c", it's equivalent to "b" in the given question. Egor P. Popov, Mechanics of Materials, second SI edition. (c) 1976. I am confused about this. Let's do the second one together.
so I have a bxb square soooo....
τmax=T/(αbc^2) so T=2.4, b=c For (b) 9.1=2.4/(0.208*b*b^2) give b=1.0823. gtg post what you have!
So what I see is b = 2c get that and c = 1/2*b get this, but where do you get the idea of b/c =2 is this saying D/d on the graph. I got to go. I solved the second part but still want to clear this up before I proceed. My buddy just got here so I am going to study thermo. I will work on it a little later.
|dw:1468382579596:dw| Above refer to the question Below refer to Popov's table on the second page. |dw:1468382678729:dw| It may be confusing because we use c for radius in formulas, b for the smaller dimension (in the question). Popov uses b for the longer dimension, and c for the smaller dimension in his table, and more importantly in the equation for tau, namely \(\Large \tau_{max}=\frac{T}{\alpha b c^2}\). So I use, for the second one part (b) \(\Large 9.1=\frac{2.4}{0.208 (b)b^2}\). [ since b=c ] and \(\Large 9.1=\frac{2.4}{0.246 (2b) (b)^2}\), since the smaller dimension is squared.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!