strenghts
I am working on the next problem for now.
The first image was hard to read because of the long exposure time. If you could, try to take the picture with more illumination to reduce exposure time. The composite beam is based on compatibility of deformations. So, again, I would subdivide load P=2.7 into two components, Pt for timber, and Ps for steel where Pt+Ps=2.7, or using simply one unknown Pt for timber, and 2.7-Pt for steel. Now you can load the two separately and equate the strains. You have probably done the following, It=2(bd^3/12), St=It/(d/2) calculate similarly Ss. Since M=P*L1 (L1=48"), we have Mt=Pt*L1, sigma_t=Mt/St, epsilon_t=sigma_t/Et. Calculate similarly epsilon_s. Equate epsilon_t=epsilon_s to solve for Pt. With known Pt and Ps, you can calculate sigma_t and sigma_s. If you can confirm the same procedure, you can post a few intermediate values for verification. I have Pt=1.577, and Ps=2.7-Pt. We'll worry about part (b) once we have solved part (a).
Let me work on it a bit.
what is wrong with my solution thoug?
Oh, by the way, it seems that my values of the stresses are both about 80% of yours. So you could check the bending moments (M=P*48"). Are the units right?
Did you split P into timber and steel components? I could not quite make out the first image, so didn't know what your strategy is.
For n = 16.145 b2, trans = 4.843 I_total = 3304 M_max = 162 kip in
M_max = (2.7 kip)*(5ft) = 162 kip-in
timber is 1 and steel is 2
|dw:1468637144807:dw|
*129.6 kip-in
That's where the 80% came from!
I think you have the rest correct! lol
Oh I see.. lol I am so burnt out today.
for stress 1 = 0.2353 psi
This time there is a factor of two, I have double that.
I suppose you mean ksi.
I meant ksi but it won't accept that as an answer.
won't accept .2353? I have .4638
I have stress = (129.6*6in)/(3304)
For It I have 2(bd^3/12)=2(3.4*12^3/12)=979.2
for wood I have that and for steel I have 2324
I don't understand the 3304 above. I would have put 979.2. In addition, 129.6 is the total bending moment for both steel and wood. You need to use the compatibility condition to separate 129.6 into the wood and steel components.
I for steel is much smaller, (0.3*12^3/12)=43.2 in^4
so for steel it's (129.6*6)/(43.2)
As I said, P is split into two components such that the total is 129.6 kip-in. Pt for wood and Ps for steel, such that both timber and steel have equal strains, epsilon.
Btw, how did you get your first attempt? they seem to be in the right proportions! lol
I am getting 3304 because I added the (I) for timber and steel together and used it
Sorry, P is split into two components, Pt and Ps such that Pt+Ps=2.7. The corresponding moments components Mt and Ms add up to 129.6. The strains are equal, so (Mt/St)/Et=(Ms/Ss)/Es to solve for Mt and Ms.
If you do that, the two are not working together, and they have different strains (slip between the two materials).
what are you doing? A system of equations? What is St and Ss?
I don't understand your notation.
St=It/(d/2), similarly for Ss. t for timber, s for steel. sigma=M/S in general.
can we just start from the beginning? So I got I_wood = 979.2in^4
I think that's a good idea. But I think the main problem is you need to ensure the two materials are bonded together.
for stress in wood?
It=979.2 in^4 is good for me. You cannot calculate stress in wood before you know how much each material shares the load of 2.7 kips.
okay
How do you propose to find the share of each one, bearing in mind that they are bonded together by bolts/rivets.
The bolts ensure that the beams have the same strain, i.e. \(\epsilon=\sigma\)/E is the same for both materials.
Ok, would you like me to explain a little about composite beams?
I don't know. Honestly I want to get this homework assignment done. I have 4 problems left and the last problem has 25 parts to it. I might call a classmate up and see what his solutions were and discuss with him.
Don't worry about it. I will figure it out. Thanks.
ok!
Okay I got it. stress 1 = 0.463 ksi stress 2 = 7.488 ksi P = 6.17 kips I had to go back and carefully analyze it.
Yes, they are correct, well done!
By the way, what I did was from first principles. You probably did it in terms of transformed sections, and that works too, and easier!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!