d
i think its the maximum point.
Im pretty sure it would be minimum but im not 100%. from what i got, the graph when up both side and not down.
i figured as the value of x increases so does the average rate of change of the curve. and when i decrease the value of x, the average of the graph goes down as well.
i figured as the value of x increases so does the average rate of change of the curve. and when i decrease the value of x, the average of the graph goes down as well.
Thats not true, but i see how you would think that.
wott?? i have the numbers to back me up bruhh
Here is a graph I made and here are some numbers -1.00 11.00 -0.80 8.02 -0.60 5.66 -0.40 3.65 -0.20 1.80 0.00 0.00 0.20 -1.80 0.40 -3.55 0.60 -5.14 0.80 -6.38 1.00 -7.00 1.20 -6.65 1.40 -4.92 1.60 -1.29 1.80 4.80 2.00 14.00
You figure this out yet Yums? :)
you found the 3 points (1.99, 13.455) (2, 14) (2.01, 14.555) as you move from 1.99 to 2.01, the "y value" gets bigger (2, 14) is not a "local minimum" because we see at x=1.99, the y value is smaller ditto for being a max I assume you see that the "curve" is increasing , and (2,14) is neither a max nor min
yes ser thats what i got....thank you all
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!