Eduardo solved the following inequality, and his work is shown below: −5(x + 4) + 21 ≥ −3 + 4(x − 8) −5x − 20 + 21 ≥ −3 + 4x − 32 −5x + 1 ≥ 4x − 35 −9x ≥ −36 x ≥ 4 What mistake did Eduardo make in solving the inequality?
Hint: It's the last step.
−5(x + 4) + 21 ≥ −3 + 4(x − 8) Use the distributive property on both sides to get: −5x − 20 + 21 ≥ −3 + 4x − 32 <----- same as Eduardo's Combine like terms on each side. −5x + 1 ≥ 4x − 35 <----- same as Eduardo's Subtract 1 from both sides. Subtract 4x from both sides. −9x ≥ −36 <---- same as Eduardo's Up to here Eduardo is correct.
How do you divide both sides of an inequality by a NEGATIVE number?
the sign flips?
Look at the following. Let's say that this is a true statement. \(\Large x \gt 5\) Let's think of a number that makes the above inequality true. For example, let x = 7. x = 7 makes the inequality true since \(\Large 7 \gt 5\) Now divide both sides by -1: \(\Large -x \gt -5\) If this new inequality is equivalent to teh original one, then x = 7 still has to work. Let's try it. We plug in 7 for x. Since the left side has -x, we get -7 on the left side. \(\Large -7 \gt -5\) This is a false statement, so you cannot just divide both sides of an inequality by -1. What would make the inequality true? \(\Large -7 \lt -5\) is a true inequality, but to obtain it, we had to switch the greater than sign for a less than sign.
You are correct.
The above shows that if you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, you must flip the inequality sign.
−9x ≥ −36 Divide both sides of the inequality by -9 and flip the sign. \(\large x \le 4\) <----- correct solution, not like Eduardo's
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!