Question below:
I need help with 58,59,60,61... It seems like I messed up my calculations.
For 57,I got the first part but couldn't solve for the second part.
57 - just use vo = 0 and plug in the time to find v \[\large v = v_0 + at\]\[\large v = 0 + (-10)t\] 58 - write equations for the position of each stone, using \[\large \Delta y= v_o t +\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }a t ^2\]First stone:\[\large \Delta y= 0* t +\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }(-10) t ^2\]Second stone\[\large \Delta y= 100 t +\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }(-10) t ^2\](not sure if the velocity is really 100; post a bigger picture) Set equations equal, solve for t. Plug t back in to find height.
yes the velocity is 100.
-5t^2 = 100t - 5t^2?
100t = 300 t = 3
No 59; using the equation for constant acceleration v^2 = u^2 + 2as u - = 10ms-1, a = -10 mx-2 and displacement s = -65 v^2 = 100 + 2*-10*-65
v is the velocity as it hits the bottom
37.41?
What about 60 and 61?
yea i get 37.41 which isnt there - close to 37.14 thogh...
Still trying to figure out what I've done wrong in 58 since it's not making sense. 60 - I'm pretty sure the height on the Moon is just six times the height on the Earth. \[\large v^2 = v_o^2 + 2 a \Delta y\]since initial velocity is the same, the only change is to a, so yes, the height will be six times the Earth height. 61 - Use one of the earlier equations and solve for t \[\large -12 = 8t +\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }(-10)t^2\]
I didnt get #60...
There isn't much to get. Acceleration and height are inversely related; that's all. 1/6th the acceleration means 6 times the height.
1/6th the acceleration means 6 times the height. is this some theorem or..?
No. It comes from solving for y\[\large v^2 = v_o^2 + 2 a \Delta y\]\[\large 0^2 = v_o^2 + 2 a \Delta y\]\[\large -v_o^2 = 2 a \Delta y\]\[\large -\frac{ v_o^2 }{ 2 a }= \Delta y\]vo is a constant, so... what happens to y if acceleration is multiplied by 1/6
Oh,yes, In #60 I got : 5t^2 - 8t - 12 = 0
Are there any questions left you need help with? If not, then please close the question
I need some clarification on #55
55 \[\large -500 = 0t + \frac{ 1 }{ 2 }(-10)t^2\]
yep
10?
Another thing to learn/memorize in 55 - time to reach max height = time to fall back to starting height. Sixty percent of the time, it works every time. 58 - still can't figure this out for sure.
in #61 5t^2 - 8t - 12 = 0 i have to use the qudratic formula righT?
Probably yes.
a = 5 b = -8 c = -12 right?
Yes.
i got 2.54 s...but thats not an option..
58 is unsolvable. Think about it - when the upward projected stone reaches its max height - its speed is zero. At that time, the downward stone has now gained downward velocity... so how is the stone at the top now supposed to catch up? They both accelerate at the same rate.
Well, Thats a point.
It'd be like dropping a stone from the top of a building, while another one is thrown downward, from halfway up the building. How the hell is the top once supposed to catch up?
@welshfella no wonder 58 wasn't making sense. It's nonsense. Unless the projected stone is projected from the ground??!
Okay,lets ASSUME its projected from the ground..
yes Agent you are right.
If it is, which it should bloody well say so, let's use\[\large y_f = y_i + v_i t + \frac{ 1 }{ 2 }at^2\]Use y=0 as the ground level, positive is upwards. First stone: \[\large y_f = 300 + 0t +\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }(-10)t^2\]Second stone:\[\large y_f = 0 + 100t +\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }(-10)t^2\]Now you can solve for t, then solve for y.
So t=3, using elimination, then plug in for y_f, the final height.
I have to subtract this value from 300 ,right?
so the equation for the stone projected from the ground is s = 100t - 5t^2 s is distance above the ground at time t the distance the second stone fell during this time is 300 - s 300 - s = 5t^2 solve these system of equations
No. y=0 is ground height. I assume they want height above ground.
yea s is the height above the ground
@welshfella i was answering "I have to subtract this value from 300 ,right?" btw
OK sorry
anyways 300 - s = 5t^2 s = 300 - 5t^2 also s = 100t - 5t^2 equate the last 2 and solve for t
t = 3s
so the height must be 225 m..?
height = 300 - 5(3)^2
Isn't it 255m? But i'm not surprised if it's wrong on your question \[\large y_f = 300 +\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }(-10)(3)^2 = 255\]
Oh no the question has it right
lol
we are all burning out xD
well its given 255.9 m which is the value you would get if you used 9.8 ms-2 for gravity
yea I'm exhausted
We're stressed out.
Thanks for the help @welshfella and @agent0smith :)
yw I've got a cold as well so I'm finished for today!!!
2.52 looks right to me (for no. 61) .
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!