If the roots of the equation \[\large\rm x^4-px^3+qx^2-pqx+1=0\] are a,b,c and d, show that \[\large\rm (a+b+c)(a+b+d)(b+c+d)(a+c+d)=1\]
I dont know if this approach is correct one but this is my view. Let x = 1 (since the equation is true for every value of x) which gives us 1-p+q-pq+1=0 p-q+pq=2 Where p = Σa q= Σab And also pq=Σabc (I dont think this equation would help)
The given equation is not true for every value of x. It is only true for four values of x.
namely a, b, c and d.
right
Step1 : Notice that a + b + c + d = p. Therefore (a+b+c)(a+b+d)(b+c+d)(a+c+d) = (p-a)(p-b)(p-c)(p-d)
@ganeshie8 We have to show the resulting equation. Thus our solution should start from given the equation. Not the way backwards.
ganeshie8 but we know that than a,b,c and d are roots of this equation so this mean that (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d)= x^4 -px^3 +qx^2 -pqx +1 too yes ?
I took only the left hand side. Not the entire equation.
@jhonyy9 yes. But here we have too many unnecessary variables
@ganeshie8 Okay
Do you still feel the starting of the proof is wrong ?
@ganeshie8 possible one bad idea but dont help here using the Viéte formulas ?
No its just that, we are not allowed to take in account with the given solution. As if we never heard of given solution
Yeah, I'm also trying to use Viete formulas and see if we can simplify
ok. so this mean that make sense really ?
Are you saying we cannot start the proof with left hand side of the statement that we want to prove ?
Yes
Why not ?
Do you think it is wrong to do that or you just don't want to do it that way ?
young man this is not the place to cheat on your test
@ganeshie8 Btw I only care about solution. I dont care if it came by bribing a mathematician so you should carry on with your solution. My opinion:- It feels okay. If we prove right to be equal to left it pretty much means the same
@DrMoss Not a test. It just I have bounded myself with some rules so I wont be surprised if a type of question came up in which this tactic rendered unusable.
Okay, so we're good with step1. Lets keep going.
OKay
Step2 : (p-a)(p-b)(p-c)(p-d) is a polynomial in "p" whose roots are a, b, c, d. So we can get its expansion simply by replacing "x" by "p" in the given polynomial : (p-a)(p-b)(p-c)(p-d) = p^4-p(p)^3+q(p)^2-pq(p)+1
simplify and you're done!
By simplification the left side is \[\large\rm p^4-(Σa) p^3+(Σab) p^2-(Σabc)p+abcd\ \]
I suggest you go through steps 1 and 2 again.
Which side are we suppose to simplify? Because I dont think any side needs simplification
(p-a)(p-b)(p-c)(p-d) = p^4-p(p)^3+q(p)^2-pq(p)+1 = ?
@FaiqRaees It would be nice if we are given the exact and complete wording of the question. A lot of energy would be wasted if people suggest a solution to be told that it is "not allowed". Math is all about precision, so please give all the parameters of the question to have a level playing field.
@ganeshie8 How is p=a+b+c+d = (p-a)(p-b)(p-c)(p-d)?
I never said p = (p-a)(p-b)(p-c)(p-d)
a + b + c + d = p gives you a + b + c = p - d b + c + d = p - a c + d + a = p - b d + a + b = p - c
@mathmate The question wordings are that exactly. It was just that my teacher didn't accepted solution in which instead of simplifying a given equation, the proof was given by expanding the given solution
Oh okay that clears a lot
So now if I can show that (p-a)(p-b)(p-c)(p-d) = p^4-p(p)^3+q(p)^2-pq(p)+1 my work is done right?
Ohkay, I see... I should have added more steps
I have already shown that for you in step2.
Let me explain step2 again.
Yeah that would be very helpful
We're given that the roots of the polynomial x^4-px^3+qx^2-pqx+1 are a, b, c, d. So we have x^4-px^3+qx^2-pqx+1 = (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d)
With me ?
Oh got it
Replace x with p
Yep, simple once you see it :)
And since we have already proven that those p brackets are just a simplified version of the given solution, the equation equals the solution
But our proof isn't complete yet I suppose. We have to prove that the given solution is equal to 1. We haven't done that or did we?
(p-a)(p-b)(p-c)(p-d) = p^4-p(p)^3+q(p)^2-pq(p)+1 = ?
0
seriously you should have some rest -.-
That is given in the equation x^4-px^3+qx^2-pqx+1=0
Again, that equation is NOT an identity. It is not true for every value of x. It is true only when x = a, b, c, d.
Oh yeah, right, I keep forgetting that. But if we input p, then it should output 1. Yeah okay understood thanks
Why ?
Algebraic manipulation(I loathe myself for missing such thing)
Happens haha. I'm just making sure you got it right :)
@ganeshie8 Yeah thanks
(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d)= x^4 -px^3 +qx^2 -pqx +1 = x^3(x-p)+qx(x-p) +1 = = (x^3 +qx)(x-p) +1 this dont help anything ?
@ganeshie8 I have a confusion for which the book is giving different answer and the people at math.stackexchange are giving different answer. Can I confirm it with you if you have time?
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @jhonyy9 (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d)= x^4 -px^3 +qx^2 -pqx +1 = x^3(x-p)+qx(x-p) +1 = = (x^3 +qx)(x-p) +1 this dont help anything ? \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) I suppose unless there is an x in the expression, it cant help anything. That's maybe why @ganeshie8 first took steps to eliminate x out of the equations
@FaiqRaees are you on stackexchange too ?
I'll try, ask
@jhonyy9 Yeah because the good members here come online very late at night(according to my timezone)
how ? are you from Europe same with me ?
@ganeshie8 What is the general formula for the coefficient of x^n-2 of a polynomial f(x) having the degree of n?
@jhonyy9 Asia
ok i understand now
Do you mean the coefficient of x^(n-2) ?
Yes
What things do we know ?
Are we given the roots of the polynomial ?
No I am just asking generally like in the form Σab or in that way
You must ask the question clearly. Then only we can pursue the answer...
If we knew the roots, we could simply use the Vieta formulas to find the coefficients.
I dont really know how to describe it Like for an equation x^n +ax^n-1+bx^n-2...... The coefficient of x^(n-1)is Σa What is for x^(n-2)?
Okay, I see what you're asking.
Consider the polynomial \[P(x) = x^n + a_{n-1} x^{n-1} + a_{n-2}x^{n-2} + \cdots + a_1 x^1 + a_0 \] Let \(\beta_1, \beta_2, \ldots , \beta_n\) be the roots of \(P(x)\).
Okay
Then we can factor P(x) as \[x^n + a_{n-1} x^{n-1} + a_{n-2}x^{n-2} + \cdots + a_1 x^1 + a_0 = (x-\beta_1)(x - \beta_2)\cdots (x-\beta_n) \]
True
What is the coefficient of x^n on left hand side ?
1
What is the coefficient of x^n on right hand side ?
1
They are equal. So we're good with the coefficients of x^n. Let's compare the coefficients of x^(n-1) both sides.
What is the coefficient of x^(n-1) on left hand side ?
a(n-1)
What is the coefficient of x^(n-1) on right hand side ?
it should be a(n-1) (considering we are allowed to assume the equality to be true otherwise no way to find out, at least for me)
Right hand side, you should get an expression in terms of the roots. Lets see
Our goal is to find the coefficient of x^(n-1) in \[ (x-\beta_1)(x - \beta_2)\cdots (x-\beta_n) \]
How many factors are there in that product ?
n
Yes. How did we find the coefficient of x^n ?
For right side? By simple logic. There is no coefficient with x in any of the factors. To reach x^n, the x terms can only multiply with x terms. Since there is no coefficient on any value of x thus the coefficient of x^n is 1. Or you can also say that by just comparing it with left side
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!