If a number can be represented using infinite fractions is it a rational number?
Is the number \[\large\rm \frac{1}{2\frac{3}{4\frac{5}{6\frac{7}{8...}}}} \] a rational number? Why or why not?
@ganeshie8 @zzr0ck3r
If it has a limit then we can call the limit rational
But shouldn't the limit be infinite?
only if it does not converge
See the denominator of the fraction keeps decreasing so the fraction must increase
in that case no. I was not sure if you were asking for a general thing, or for this example.
Oh I was concerned for both
But dont we consider infinite number rational?
no
its not a number
So the best answer to these question is undefined right?
If the limit is rational then we are good, but rational sequences can converge to irrational numbers
jerks :)
lol
these type of numbers aren't officially recognized in mathematics right?
I am not sure what you mean, but everything you can think of is defined to be something :)
I think your original question is just asking if sequences that live in \(\mathbb{Q}\) can ever converge to something not in \(\mathbb{Q}\) and they can
I mean no theorems about these type of numbers have been passed (like the type of development we have done on defining and manipulating infinities)
Still a bit confused on which numbers you are talking about. There are an infinite amount of types of infinity and some say an uncountable infinite amount of types of infinity. Not sure if that helps.
These type of numbers refer the numbers which can be representated using infinite fractions
But when we say that, we are talking about size of sets. When we say something does not converge, or converges to infinity, we are really just saying, that we can not say, that given any small number \(\epsilon\), there is some term of the sequence where, for the rest of the terms, will stay within \(\epsilon\) of some limit (some number).
they either converge or dont. If they do then it is a real number and we know much about them, if it does not, then it is not a number. But we don't clasify exactly what that means because we could have many things that happen. A sequence could flip flop or it could grow without bounds.
@zzr0ck3r Thanks for answering my weird question
They are the best questions :)
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @zzr0ck3r They are the best questions \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) Thank you
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!