Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (adobohobo):

Help please

OpenStudy (adobohobo):

OpenStudy (adobohobo):

Hi, I need help with this problem. I don't understand it.

OpenStudy (faiqraees):

Okay this is just based on targeted guessing but if you see the above matrix, the pattern is [coefficient of x, R.H.S, coefficient of z]. Since y is the only thing omitted, I think y

OpenStudy (loser66):

That is the Crammer's rule to find x,y, z

OpenStudy (loser66):

When applying it, you need know the determinant of the system. Like this: The original one is \(A \vec x=b\), and your A is \(A=\left [\begin{matrix}1&2&-1\\2&3&2\\1&-2&-2\end{matrix}\right]\) Let the first column is \(A_1\) the second column is \(A_2\) and the third one is \(A_3\) then, your A is \(A = \left[A_1~~A_2~~A_3\right]\) ok?

OpenStudy (loser66):

On the original one, your b is \(\vec b= \left[\begin{matrix}-7\\-3\\3\end{matrix}\right]\)

OpenStudy (loser66):

The Crammer's rule says that to find x, you do: replace \(A_1\) by \(\vec b\) to get a new matrix, say \(A_x\), then \(x=\dfrac{det A_x}{det A}\)

OpenStudy (loser66):

to find y, you do the same, but replace \(A_2 \) by \(\vec b\) to get a new matrix, say \(A_y\) then \(y =\dfrac{det A_y}{det A}\), that is what you show on the question

OpenStudy (loser66):

|dw:1470486644622:dw|

OpenStudy (loser66):

|dw:1470486782596:dw|

OpenStudy (loser66):

got what I meant?

OpenStudy (loser66):

Same method to find z You have \(A\vec x=b\) and then \(\vec x = A^{-1}b\) However, not all A is invertible, Crammer's rule allow you to find \(\vec x\) if A is not invertible.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!