Volume
the answer is supposed to be 3pi/5 but i'm getting 4pi/5 i don't even think my method of doing it was good >.<
would the last example work similarly? http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/TripleIntegrals.aspx
May I see your work or can you describe your method briefly ?
like, have you used polar/cylindrical coordinates ?
I followed the last example from the link above. i used polar coordinates, yeah and in the example they already had some thing to integrate but since i didn't i just put that as one, but everything else, i did the same.
I'm getting 2pi/5 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%5Cint%5Climits_0%5E%7B2pi%7D%5Cint%5Climits_0%5E1+r%5E4+dr+d%5Ctheta
how did you get r^4?
Would you agree that the projection in xy plane is a unit disc ?
yes
Nvm, I've interpreted it worngly. Let's try agian.
Here the surface is f(x,y) = (x^2+y^2)^(3/2) We're interested in the volume above the surface f(x,y) and below the plane z = 1
okay
Therefore the bounds for z are : z = 1 - f(x,y)
\[V = \iint 1-f(x,y)\,dx\,dy\]
In polar coordinates : \[V = \int\limits_0^{2\pi}\int\limits_0^1 [1-(r^2)^{3/2}]~rdrd\theta\]
okay
Yaay that seems to give us 3pi/5 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%5Cint%5Climits_0%5E%7B2pi%7D%5Cint%5Climits_0%5E1+(1-r%5E3)*r+dr+d%5Ctheta
ooooooh okay!!
Thank you so much! @ganeshie8
yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!