Please help me with solving this equation?
\[R(r _{1}r _{2})=r _{1}r _{2}\]
solving for r2
I'm thinking this as the first step: \[Rr _{1}*Rr _{2}=r _{1} r _{2}\]
Wait a minute... I think I messed up. \[R(r _{1}-r _{2})=r _{1}r _{2}\]
psstt, the distributive property only applies when you're multiplying a number/variable to the sum or difference of two other numbers/variable like a(b + c) = ab + ac when multiplying 3 numbers, remember the associative property of multiplication: a(bc) = (ab)c since when you're multiplying, it doesn't matter which order you multiply in For example 3 * 2 * 5 3 * 2 is 6, and 6 * 5 is 30 2* 5 is 10 and 10* 3 is 30 we arrive at the same answer now to isolate \(r_2\), we need to do something to both sides to get rid of \(r_1\) what is \(r_1\) doing to \(r_2\) Multiplying? Dividing? Adding? Subtracting? We'll need to do the opposite of that to both sides to get rid of it from one side :)
Multiplying? So I would need to divide the \[r _{1}\] on both sides?
oh is the question actually: \[R(r _{1}-r _{2})=r _{1}r _{2}\] In that case, you can distribute it using the distributive formula a(b - c) = ab - ac
yes, you would need to divide \(r_1\) on both sides :)
\[Rr _{1} - Rr _{2}=r _{1}r _{2}\]
Then, \[Rr _{1}=r _{1}r _{2}-Rr _{2}\]
+, not -
\[\frac{ Rr _{1} }{ R-r _{1}}=r _{2}\]
+, not -, sorry
Wait a minute.... I feel so dumb now. lol I think I figured it out. :)
if you change the - to a + that should be correct :)
Thank you for your guidance. :)
Anytime! :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!