Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 11 Online
OpenStudy (kkutie7):

Someone please help me figure this out

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

\[Y^{-2}_{2}(\theta,\psi)=\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}(\sin)^{2}\]

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

is a spherical harmonic and describes a d-orbital find an expression for:

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

\[(\frac{ dY^{-2}_{2} }{ d \psi})_{\theta}\] and \[(\frac{ dY^{-2}_{2} }{ d \sin(\theta)})_{\psi}\]

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

\[(\frac{ dY^{-2}_{2} }{ d \psi})_{\theta}=-2i\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}(\sin)^{2}\]

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

treating sin(theta)=x \[(\frac{ dY^{-2}_{2} }{ d \sin(\theta)})_{\psi}=\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}2(x)\] \[\rightarrow (\frac{ dY^{-2}_{2} }{ d \sin(\theta)})_{\psi}=\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}2(sin(\theta))\]

OpenStudy (jclark):

Sorry I can't help, but what math is this?

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

it is called "mathematics for physical chemistry"

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

@zepdrix @satellite73 hey do you guys know how to partial derivatives I'm still learning and could use the help

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

ideas?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

I don't understand this notation,\[\large\rm \left(\frac{ dY^{-2}_{2} }{ d \psi}\right)_{\theta}\]Are you taking a full derivative with respect to phi? and a partial with respect to theta?

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

it means the derivative with respect to psi while keeping theta constant.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

You just described a partial derivative. So you meant to take partials of Y with respect to both? Like this?\[\large\rm \left(\frac{ \partial Y^{-2}_{2} }{ \partial \psi}\right)_{\theta}\]Why use mixed notation then? I'm still really confused...

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

yeah its a partial derivative. i was told to just make theta a constant and "carry it along" I'm just learning this so I'm not one to provide much clarity =(

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\large\rm Y^{-2}_{2}=\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}\sin^{2}\theta\]Ugh this is making no sense :( If you were trying to do this,\[\large\rm \left(Y^{-2}_{2}\right)_{\phi}=-2i\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}\sin^{2}\theta\]Then yes, you did that properly. You treated the entire square root, and the sine stuff as constant, and just applied your exponent derivative rule.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

But I still don't understand what that derivative notation is doing on the inside...

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

i dont understand it either it looks like a mess to me. what about the second one?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Oh I wrote the wrong greek letter :D haha sorry

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\large\rm \left(Y^{-2}_{2}\right)_{\psi}=-2i\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}\sin^{2}\theta\]

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

i didn't notice lol

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

i dropped the sign and i in mine... humm

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Oh :x

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

so is that how you take a derivative in respect to sintheta? it just looks so wrong to me

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Let's back up a second... this \(\large\rm \left(\frac{ dY^{-2}_{2} }{ d \sin\theta}\right)_{\psi}\) is not the same as this \(\large\rm \left(Y^{-2}_{2}\right)_{\psi}\) So if they want us to first take a full derivative, with respect to sin(theta), then let's do that.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\large\rm \frac{d Y^{-2}_{2}}{d \sin \theta}=\color{royalblue}{\left(\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}\right)'}\sin^{2}\theta+\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}\color{royalblue}{\left(\sin^{2}\theta\right)'}\]Product rule, ya?

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

i follow

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\large\rm \frac{d Y^{-2}_{2}}{d \sin \theta}=\color{orangered}{\left(\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}(-2i)\frac{d \psi}{d \sin \theta}\right)}\sin^{2}\theta+\sqrt{\frac{ 15 }{ 32\pi }}e^{-2i \psi}\color{royalblue}{\left(\sin^{2}\theta\right)'}\]This is going to give us a little bit of weird garbage though :D So I dunno if this is the route they intended lol. We end up with this psi' term, ya? I've only differentiated the first term so far, hence the color change.

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

I see what you did but i'm not 100% on why you did it. I'm getting confused because this isn't how I was taught =(. can I show you the example I was given on how to do this?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Sure, that might help.

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

example: the 2p orbital is described by the wave function: \[\psi_(r,\theta,\phi)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{32a^{5}_{B}}}re^{\frac{-r}{2a_{B}}}sin(\theta)cos(\phi)\] calculate: \[(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial\theta})_{r,\phi}\] and \[(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r})_{\theta,\phi}\]

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

answer: \[\psi_(r,\theta,\phi)=Cre^{\frac{-r}{2a_{B}}}sin(\theta)cos(\phi)\] \[(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial\theta})_{r,\phi}=Cre^{-\frac{r}{2_{B}}}cos(\phi)cos(\theta)\] \[(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r})_{\theta,\phi}=C(sin(\theta))(cos(\phi))[e^{\frac{-r}{2_{B}}}+r(\frac{-1}{2}a_{B})e^{\frac{-r}{2_{B} }}]\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Woah, why did the stuff in the exponent change?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Where did the a go?

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

=( its supposed to be there still i dont know what happened

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Oh ok

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Why is there a C in the final answers? That doesn't make any sense. What is C?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Oh you renamed the ugly fraction at the start to be C. Ok fair enough

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

yes lol and here: \[(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial r})_{\theta,\phi}=C(sin(\theta))(cos(\phi))[e^{\frac{-r}{2a_{B}}}+r(\frac{-1}{2}a_{B})e^{\frac{-r}{2a_{B} }}]\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

This isn't making sense to me :( Grrr Like... here, the first one...\[\large\rm \left(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial\color{orangered}{\theta}}\right)_{r,\phi}=Cre^{-\frac{r}{2_{B}}}\cos\phi\color{orangered}{\cos\theta}\]Ok sin(theta) turned into cos(theta), good.\[\large\rm \left(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial\theta}\right)_{\color{orangered}{r},\phi}=C\color{orangered}{re^{-\frac{r}{2_{B}}}}\cos\phi\cos\theta\]Partial with respect to r gives us the same thing back for the exponential with -1/2a_b coming down in front. Presumably this was absorbed into the C maybe, but where in the world is this r coming from?\[\large\rm \left(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial\theta}\right)_{r,\color{orangered}{\phi}}=Cre^{-\frac{r}{2_{B}}}\color{orangered}{\cos\phi}\cos\theta\]And then the partial with respect to phi, why aren't we ending up with -sin(phi) ?? This makes no seeeeeeeense :((

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

Thats where we are doing things different i was told to treat r an phi as constants. I'm not supposed to take the partial with respect to them

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Oh oh, ok so that's what this weird notation means maybe. But that still doesn't explain the r in front. Hmm.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Generally speaking, at least in math classes, \(\large\rm \dfrac{\partial y}{\partial x}\) means the same thing as \(\large\rm y_x\) So maybe you can see why this new notation is really bonkers.

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

you look like you are doing mixed partial derivatives which would look like this: \[\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial\theta\partial r\partial\phi}\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Oh the r was there the entire time :( I wrote the problem down wrong woops t.t

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

its completely strange to me too. i learned this friday

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Ok this is making a lot more sense then :)

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\large\rm Y^{-2}_{2}(\theta,\psi)=\sqrt{\frac{15}{32\pi}}e^{-2i\psi}\sin^{2}\theta\]

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

yes so i was told to split that into two partials

zepdrix (zepdrix):

When you're going to take the partial with respect to psi, you can think of the function like this sort of,\[\large\rm Y^{-2}_{2}(\theta,\psi)=Ce^{-2i\psi}\]The exponential is the only thing you're differentiating.\[\large\rm \frac{\partial Y}{\partial \psi}=-2i Ce^{-2i\psi}=-2i\sqrt{\frac{15}{32\pi}}e^{-2i\psi}\sin^{2}\theta\]Treating the sin^2theta as constant in the process.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

This is a tough problem to refresh on partials lol. You should have covered them a little bit in Calc 3 :D

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

never did calc 3 D= i'm in physical chemistry math

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Oh dear :o

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

yupp i got the same for the first one

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Your other one looks good also.\[\large\rm \frac{\partial Y}{\partial \sin \theta}=\sqrt{\frac{15}{32\pi}}e^{-2i\psi}2\sin\theta\]Power rule on your sine, and no chain rule because the the argument of our differentiation matches the next chain, ya? You remember simple problems like this right?\[\large\rm \frac{d}{dx}\left(x\right)^2=(x)^1\frac{d}{dx}x\]You COULD chain like this ^ But notice the inner function matches the argument of differentiation. So this dx/dx that we end up with is meaningless. We always skip that step. Same thing here, you end up with a d sin(theta)/d sin(theta) when you chain.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So all of that arguing and nonsense just to say, "yes you're right" lol XD

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

well sweet lol

OpenStudy (kkutie7):

thank you

zepdrix (zepdrix):

np :U go eat a butterfinger, you've earned it. Or snap into a slim jim.. or something

OpenStudy (agent0smith):

^I love food. Good job zep.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!