Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 11 Online
OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Please Help Me!

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

My last problem!

OpenStudy (taylor0402):

ummm give me a second i might be able to help

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Separable DE.

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Its second order, Idk how these really work D:

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

the one you posted is first order.

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

oh ...

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

\(\color{black}{\displaystyle y''+6y'+9y=0}\) that one?

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

yea

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

So, in general, when you have an equation \(\color{black}{\displaystyle ay''(t)+by'(t)+cy(t)=0}\) then, you write the so called 'characteristic equation' \(\color{black}{\displaystyle ar^2+br+c=0}\). (where a, b, c are constants, and notice that the power of \(r\) is equivalent to the order of the derivative.) So, suppose this equation (\(\color{black}{\displaystyle ar^2+br+c=0}\)) has real solutions in a form: \(\color{black}{\displaystyle x=r_1}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle x=r_2}\) then, the general solution to the differential equation is: \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y(t)=c_1e^{r_1t}+c_2e^{r_2t}}\) Then, you are given some initial conditions. \(y(0)=\beta\) \(y'(0)=\delta\) Why "initial conditions"? To solve for \(c_1\) and \(c_2\). For the general solution you have, \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y(t)=c_1e^{r_1t}+c_2e^{r_2t}}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y'(t)=(r_1)c_1e^{r_1t}+(r_2)c_2e^{r_2t}}\) Then, you are plugging the initial conditions: \(\color{black}{\displaystyle \beta=c_1e^{r_1\times 0}+c_2e^{r_2 \times 0 }}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle \delta=(r_1)c_1e^{r_1\times 0}+(r_2)c_2e^{r_2\times 0}}\) and solve for \(c_1\) and \(c_2\).

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

This is the general layout. (And don't get frustrated. This is abstract. \(r_1\) and \(r_2\) are going to be the already known (constant) solutions to your characteristic equation.)

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

However, when the root (for the characteristic equation) is repeated. If you have \(x=r_1\) and \(x=r_1\) Then, your general solution should be. \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y(t)=c_1e^{r_1t}+c_2\color{blue}{t}e^{r_1t}}\) -------------REMARK------------- (adding t, so that the components of the solution are linearly independent ... well .. if you just had c1e^rt+c2e^rt, then c1 and c2 are just arbitrary constants, and then you have (c1+c2)e^rt ----> Ce^rt, and thus you only accounting for only ONE (not two) roots) --------------------------------- And then, the same ... plug in your initial conditions as in the general layout. (Except that differentiation is a little harder, because you will need the product rule for (c2)(t)e^(r_1t) ...)

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

I will do a very similar example to yours right now.

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Okay

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

\(\color{black}{\displaystyle y''-8y'+16y=0}\) ------NOTE------ Also a perfect square trinomial, if you write the characteristic equation for this DE, just like in your case. (Well, the numbers are different.) ----------------- \(\color{red}{\large [1]~{\rm Characteristic~Equation}}\rm~~(and~the~roots~of~it)\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle r^2-8r+16=0}\) Notice that you can rewrite the above equation as, \(\color{black}{\displaystyle (r-4)^2=0}\) and thus the roots are (repeated root) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle r_1=4}\) and \(\color{black}{\displaystyle r_2=4}\) \(\color{red}{\large [2]~{\rm General~Solution}}\) general the general solution is in the form \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y(t)=c_1e^{r_1t}+c_2e^{r_2t}}\) \(\\[0.9em]\) BUT, in order to account for both solutions WHEN ROOT IS REPEATED, you multiply one of the parts by the t (as I explained in the REMARK). So, in this case, the root is also repeated. We multiply times t. \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y(t)=c_1e^{r_1t}+c_2\color{blue}{t}e^{r_1t}}\) (I am not done, I am posting this so that you read as I go on ......)

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

In this case, the root was \(\color{black}{\displaystyle r_1=4}\) (twice ... repeated root) So, the general solution in this particular case is: \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y(t)=c_1e^{4t}+c_2te^{4t}}\) .

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Right

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

\(\color{red}{{\large [3]~{\rm General~Solution}}~\color{blue}{\bf~~with~~initial~~conditions.}}\) Suppose I was given \(y(\ln [1/16])=1 \) \(y'(\ln [1/81])=2 \) (I am making the algebra easy for me ... sorry for laziness ... the point is the example anyway xD) Then, I plug in my conditions. I have: \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y(t)=c_1e^{4t}+c_2te^{4t}}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y'(t)=4c_1e^{4t}+\underbrace{4c_2te^{4t}+c_2e^{4t}}_{\large \rm (Product~Rule)}}\) So, let's plug in everything. \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y(\ln 16)=c_1e^{4(\ln [1/16])}+c_2te^{4(\ln [1/16])}=1}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y'(\ln [1/81])=c_1e^{4(\ln [1/81])}+c_2te^{4(\ln [1/81])}=2}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle c_1e^{-\ln [2]}+c_2te^{-\ln [2]}=1}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle c_1e^{-\ln [3]}+c_2te^{-\ln [3]}=2}\)

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Oh, sory I forgot to plug in for t into thy y' equation. let me fix that

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

\(\color{black}{\displaystyle y'(\ln [1/81])=c_1e^{4(\ln [1/81])}+c_2(\ln [1/81])e^{4(\ln [1/81])}=2}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle c_1e^{-\ln [3]}+(-4\ln [3])c_2e^{-\ln [3]}=2}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle (1/3)[c_1+(-4\ln [3])c_2]=2}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle c_1-4\ln [3]c_2=6}\)

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Sorry I keep leaving things out.

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

No worries. I really appreciate the help.

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Basically, you are plugging \(y(h)=k\) and \(y'(l)=m\) into So you have two equations to solve for \(c_1\) and \(c_2\). \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y(t)=c_1e^{Rt}+c_2te^{Rt}}\) \(\color{black}{\displaystyle y'(t)=Rc_1e^{Rt}+Rc_2te^{Rt}+c_2e^{Rt}}\) to then solve for \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) (numerically). Lastly, you are to plug in the solutions for \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) into the general solutions.

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

solution ***

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Okay, then to implement it to my problem... \[y'' + 6y'+9y=0 \rightarrow r^2+6r+9=0 \rightarrow (r+3)^2 \rightarrow r=-3\] \[y(t) = C_1e^{-3t}+C_2 te^{-3t}\] Plugging in the first initial value:\[y(0)=0 \rightarrow C_1 = 0\] and if we plug in our first constant, then we get \[y(t) = C_2te^{-3t}\] (Since the Constant 0 makes the whole first part 0.) Am I right so far? :D

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

after you found y(t), you went off track

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Oh, didn't notice, you actually did find C1 correctly. Good jub.

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Thanks :D

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

But, for to use the second initial condition \(y'(0)=1\), you will need to differentiate \(y(t)=C_1e^{-3t}+C_2te^{-3t}\) \(y'(t)=-3C_1e^{-3t}+-3C_2te^{-3t}+C_2e^{-3t}\)

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Cant you just take out the first part of the equation with the constant, since you already know what it is 0.

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

You can re-write it simpler, a bit. \(y'(t)=(-3C_1+C_2)e^{-3t}-3C_2te^{-3t}\) you have already found \(C_1=0\), so you can plug this in already. ((Be happy you are given easier initial conditions)) \(y'(t)=C_2e^{-3t}-3C_2te^{-3t}\) Then, since \(y'(0)=1\), therefore .... \(1=C_2\)

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

oh, yes, I think you are able to do this in this case, very clever. (Just don't get into this habit, because the initial conditions won't be zeros in the future problems as you move on)

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Well, you can do it the standard way, if you lean to the standard-writers category. Or, you can do it your way (in this case), which is very clever. Good job on that!

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

in either case, you will find \(C_2=1\) and \(C_1=0\).

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Okie. So then my final answer would be. \[y=te^{-3t}\]

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

So, yes, just as you impressively nailed, \(y(t)=C_2e^{-3t}\) .... YES, EXACTLY !

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Um but i should replace t with x huh? for my problem?

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Yes, \(x\).

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

I hate to use \(x\) in DE, because more often than not, it is a function of t. (Esp, in system of linear DE)

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Wait, we got different answers. You got \[y = e^{-3t}\] I got \[y= te^{-3t}\]

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

I didn't write that t, it should be there.

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Nice catch!

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Oh okay, cool beans :3

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

Yups :)

OpenStudy (itz_sid):

Thanks! You have really made my day. I appreciate the help. :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!