Find an equation of the tangent to the curve at the given point by two methods: (a) without eliminating the parameter and b) by first elminating the parameter
\[x = 1 + lnt, y = t^2 + 2\]
At (1, 3)
For part a,\[\large\rm \frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{\dot y}{\dot x}\]
I know how to do this problem given a value for t, but not given the point...
For dy/dx I got 2t^2
What are the dots on top of the y and x?
It's just a different notation used for `time derivatives`. \(\large\rm \frac{dy}{dt}=\dot y=y'\)
Ah interesting. Okay
\[\large\rm \color{orangered}{x}=1+\ln t\qquad\qquad\qquad \color{orangered}{y}=t^2+2\]We have values for x and y at least,\[\large\rm \color{orangered}{1}=1+\ln t\qquad\qquad\qquad \color{orangered}{3}=t^2+2\]
This should allow you to find values for t.
ln(t)=0 has no solution. Are you sure you have the equations written down properly? Hmm
Hmm yes the equations are correct. The book gives the answer as: y = 2x + 1
Did I say ln(t)=0 has no solution? Oh boy my brain is failing today :) lol. I meant ln(0) has no solution. But obviously ln(t)=0 has the solution of t=1, right?
You have to make sure that value satisfies both equations though.
Your derivative looks correct.\[\large\rm \frac{dy}{dx}=2t^2\]
Evaluating this derivative at x=1, y=3 and t=1,\[\large\rm \frac{dy}{dx}=2\]This gives us the `slope` of the tangent line, ya?\[\large\rm y-y_o=m(x-x_o)\]\[\large\rm y-y_o=2(x-x_o)\]
Where did you get the values x=1, y=3 and t=1 from?
(x,y) = (1,3) corresponds to some `specific t value`.
x and y take on these values at some `specific time`.
By plugging x=1 and y=3 into our equations, we are able to solve for t.
\[\large\rm \color{orangered}{x}=1+\ln t\qquad\qquad\qquad \color{orangered}{y}=t^2+2\]\[\large\rm \color{orangered}{1}=1+\ln t\qquad\qquad\qquad \color{orangered}{3}=t^2+2\]
\[\large\rm 3=t^2+2\]Subtracting 2,\[\large\rm 1=t^2\]Square root,\[\large\rm t=\pm1\]So t could potentially be 1 or negative. We need to find the value that satisfies BOTH equations though.\[\large\rm 1=1+\ln t\]\[\large\rm 0=\ln t\]t=-1 will NOT satisfy this equation. So t=1 is the specific time that we were looking for.
Gotcha! Now all that's left to do is find the slope at t = 1, which is 2. y - 3 = 2(x-1) y = 2x +1 Yep :) thanks zep!
What about for part b though?
\[\large\rm x=1+\ln t\qquad\qquad\qquad y=t^2+2\]Hmm.. Let's try solving for t in the first equation.\[\large\rm x-1=\ln t\]\[\large\rm e^{x-1}=t\]And I guess we can replace the t in our second equation with this, ya?
Yes that sounds right
\[y = e ^{2x-2}+2\]
Like this right?
Umm yes. So doing it this way, you've completely eliminated the parameter. No need for your fancy parameter derivative.. thing.
So would I take the derivative the regular way?
Yes
Does this look right? \[(4x-4)e ^{2x-2}\]
\[\large\rm y'=e^{2x-2}(2x-2)'\]
Wouldn't it need to be multiplied by the inside function? So by 2?
*The derivative of the inside function I mean
\[\large\rm y'=e^{2x-2}(2)\]Ya that looks better.
... but the top still needs to come down right? Like \[y' = (2x-2)e ^{2x-2}*2\]
Or am I wrong?
No, the top doesn't come down. The derivative of the top comes down only.
Gotta master that chain rule girly!! :)
Mmmmm yeah, the e^x and e^a stuff always trips me up. So \[2e ^{2x-2}\] Then what?
\(\large\rm y'(x)=2e^{2x-2}\) Then evaluate your derivative function at x=1, y=3.
By plugging in x =1?
It would equal 2. Then the same steps as last time to get the equation. Alrighty :) Zepman to the rescue.
yayyy team
:D
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!