Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (itiaax):

How do I prove this is an equivalence relationship?

OpenStudy (itiaax):

Is this even an equivalence relationship? It doesn't seem to be reflexive

OpenStudy (triciaal):

Btainstorming a,b are even R = {2,4,6,8,} R = (a,b) = (a, a +2 ) What is an equivalence relationship? @mathmate

OpenStudy (itiaax):

An equivalence relation is one that is reflexive, symmetric and transitive

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Hmm :|

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

lol this one's easy... had to do a more general form actually. What's your problem with the reflexive property?

OpenStudy (itiaax):

Hmm, Is it reflexive/ @inkyvoyd To me, it doesn't want to seem so since it doesn't have in all ordered pairs from 1 to 9

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Are you misunderstanding notation? (a,b) refers to the relation aRb or maybe even a=b if you overload the = operator

OpenStudy (itiaax):

Ahh, so that means we are only looking at R and not A?

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

No, the notation is super confusing. Let me do it another way for the equivalence relation of the equals "=" sign (like 1=1, 1=/=2, etc) A={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} Let R be equivalence relation such that R:={(a,b) | a and b are equal, i.e. a=b} Does that help illustrate the notation? Of course this is different from the equivalence relation in your problem but I'm just putting it out there to see if it makes things make more sense... We're simply checking to see if two numbers are the same parity in the original problem. (if both odd, they are equal, if both even, they are equal, if one odd and one even, they are not equal)

OpenStudy (itiaax):

Ahh, I get what you're trying to say

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

yeah so here's a tip - sometimes notation is just trash, but it's part of pure math (and for better or for worse you've found yourself on the doorstep of that domain) to be notation heavy. So I was confused too for this problem, but I just took on faith what they claimed, and tried to make sense of the notation, and that was the result. Of course I googled the usage of ordered pairs to designate equivalence relations, but I had the intuition to do so in the first place by assuming what made the most sense.

OpenStudy (itiaax):

Thank you!

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

did you figure out how to do this?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!