explanation on line integrals
could someone please explain what happened at a)? what did the person mean by putting it all together...?
Step by step: \(\vec F = \left( \begin{matrix} yz \\ xz \\ xy + 18z \end{matrix} \right) = \nabla f = \left( \begin{matrix} \partial_x f \\ \partial_y f \\ \partial_z f \end{matrix} \right) \) \(\partial_x f = yz \implies f = xyz + \alpha_1(y, z)\) \(\partial_y f = xz \implies f = xyz + \alpha_2(x, z)\) \(\partial_z f = xy + 18z \implies f = xyz + 9 z^2 + \alpha_3(x, y)\) \(\implies \alpha_1(y, z) = \alpha_2(x, z) = 9z^2 + C\) ....and: \(\alpha_3(x, y) = C\)
There's another way to do this ... which *might* be easier to follow: You're told there is a potential function so the field is path-independent/ conservative. ie you can choose any way you like to get to from \(<0,0,0>\) to \(<x,y,z>\). You will always get the same result: \(f(x,y,z) - f(0,0,0)\) So for the line integral \(\int_C \vec F(\vec r) \cdot d\vec r\) where \(\vec r = <x,y,z>\) along this path: \(\left( \begin{matrix} 0 \\ 0\\ 0 \end{matrix} \right) \to \left( \begin{matrix} x \\ 0\\ 0 \end{matrix} \right) \to \left( \begin{matrix} x \\ y\\ 0 \end{matrix} \right) \to \left( \begin{matrix} x \\ y\\ z \end{matrix} \right)\) .....you have: - Along step 1, \(y,z,dy,dz = 0\) - Along 2, \(z, dx, dz = 0\) - Along 3, \(dx, dy = 0\) The integral becomes: \(\int_0^x 0 ~ dx + \int_0^y 0 ~ dy + \int_0^z xy + 18 z ~ dz = xyz + 9 z^2 \)
If you have time, see https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02-multivariable-calculus-fall-2007/video-lectures/lecture-21-gradient-fields/ this covers 2-D problems See Lecture 30, where they extend the ideas to 3-Dimensions
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!