Given a damped mass system in which the mass is subject to harmonic forcing of Fo*sin(wt), show that the peak amplitude of the vibration occurs at a frequency wp given by the expression. wp/wn = [1 - 2(Z^2)]^(1/2) where Z is the damping ratio
@IrishBoy123
wp = peak frequency
wn = natural frequency
yeah, i got it!! so we need to solve a 2nd order non-hom DE it's all been transcribed on Wiki , thankfully
I am going to upload a picture of my notes. I want to know if we apply these steps.
sure but you know what the story is here? you're solving a 2nd order non-hom DE ?
and then doing a load of really shιtty algebra to match stuff up
So the homogenous part goes to zero and we just take the derivative of the particular solution.
you will always have a complementary solution and a particular solution.
For a long period of time, the complementary goes to zero though.
no! the complimentary is the perpetual oscillation for a spring-mass system. the eternal exchange of energy. it is then conditioned by the damping term. which is the loss of energy
which can also be included in the complementary....so you are right
Okay.
The natural frequency goes to zero.
I am working on it now. I will show you my solution when I am done.
I will post it up. I will brb and then tag you.
i will try work a solution too
What I have so far.
Your stuff looks good and ends I think here: \(x(t) = - \dfrac{F_o c \omega}{ ( c \omega )^2 + (k - m \omega^2)^2} \cos \omega t + \dfrac{F_o (k - m \omega^2))}{(c \omega )^2 + (k - m \omega^2)^2} \sin \omega t \) if we replace with \(z = \dfrac{c}{2m}\) and \(\omega_n = \sqrt{\dfrac{k}{m}}\) it becomes \(x(t) = - \dfrac{F_o 2mz \omega}{ ( 2mz \omega )^2 + (m \omega_n^2 - m \omega^2)^2} \cos \omega t + \dfrac{F_o (m \omega_n^2 - m \omega^2))}{(2mz \omega )^2 + (m \omega_n^2 - m \omega^2)^2} \sin \omega t \) and \(x(t) = - \dfrac{2 z \omega F_o /m}{ ( 2z \omega )^2 + ( \omega_n^2 - \omega^2)^2} \cos \omega t + \dfrac{ ( \omega_n^2 - \omega^2) F_o/m }{(2z \omega )^2 + ( \omega_n^2 - \omega^2)^2} \sin \omega t \) In this form it is easy to turn into a single sinusoid using an addition formula \(\sin (A - B) = \sin A \cos B - \sin B \cos A\) Looks more obvious this way.... \(x(t) =\dfrac{F_o}{m} \dfrac{1}{ \sqrt {( 2z \omega )^2 + ( \omega_n^2 - \omega^2)^2}} \left( - \dfrac{2 z \omega }{\sqrt{ ( 2z \omega )^2 + ( \omega_n^2 - \omega^2)^2}} \cos \omega t \\ + \dfrac{ ( \omega_n^2 - \omega^2) }{\sqrt { (2z \omega )^2 + ( \omega_n^2 - \omega^2)^2}} \sin \omega t \right)\) Making it: \(x_p=\dfrac{F_o}{m} \dfrac{1}{ \sqrt {( 2z \omega )^2 + ( \omega_n^2 - \omega^2)^2}} \sin (\omega t - \psi) \qquad \star\) That way you can read the amplitude straight off. If you differentiate the non-sinusoid bit of \(\star\) wrt \(\omega\) you should then get \(\omega\) for the max amplitude of the steady state oscillation. Without some IV's I don't see how you can say much about the transient decaying oscillation that is your complimentary solution. Which again I would also be tempted to write in this combined form as \(x_c = A e^{- zt } \sin (\omega_n t + \phi)\) Furthermore I get a slightly different answer to the one you are looking for so maybe I am goofing along the way.
Guess what... All she wanted was to show a proof... Lol
yes but there's no proof or her equation is wrong or i'm a fucκwit. most likely outcome.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!