algebraically find the x-intercept(s) of this quadratic relation y= -x^2+2x+8
Could I help you?
You have to factor this quadratic, putting it into intercept form.
@confuzion
How would i do that
"find the x-intercept(s) of this quadratic relation" means where does this parabola strike/intersect/touch the x-axis. In other words, it wants the roots (the solution) of this quadratic equation!
I know the xintercepts are -2 and 4 but how do i algebraically find that out
Use the quadratic formula to find out these two, or as @ShadowLegendX has said; factor this quadratic!
\[y= -x^2+2x+8 \] Factor out -1 \[y= -(x^2 -2x-8)\] The product of 2 and -4 is -8 The sum of -4 and 2, is -2 \[y = -(x - 4)(x + 2)\]
Take the opposite sign of -4 and 2, Roots are 4 and -2
so i don't do anything with the negative sign in front of the brackets
In the future, if you end up with parentheses that have something like (2x -5)(3x + 2) Solve for the roots by equaling them to zero, like so 2x - 5 =0 2x = 5 x = 5/2 3x + 2 = 0 3x = -2 x = -2/3
No, they just wanted the roots
or the "x-intercepts"
okay thanks
Since they ask for the algebraic method, I would show your work how you got those roots x - 4 = 0 x = 4 x + 2 = 0 x = -2
\[\LARGE {y = -(x - 4)(x + 2)\\let~~ y=0\\-(x - 4)(x + 2)=0\\(x - 4)(x + 2)=0\\(x-4)=0~~~or~~~(x+2)=0\\x=4~~~~~~and ~~~~~~~x=-2}\]
@ShadowLegendX AND @3mar Thanks
Don't mention it! That is with my pleasure! Any Help... Any Time... Any more questions?
No but thank you so much!
Don't hesitate to ask me if there is any difficulty faces you!
@confuzion the reason the negative sign in front of the factors doesn't matter is that you can pass an infinite variety of parabolas through a given pair of x-intercepts. Try graphing the following: \[y=-(x-1)(x+1)\]\[y=-2(x-1)(x+1)\]\[y=3(x-1)(x+1)\]on the same graph. You can do this by giving google the following search string: plot -1(x-1)(x+1), -2(x-1)(x+1), 3(x-1)(x+1)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!