Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 17 Online
OpenStudy (irishboy123):

Legendre @ Osprey

OpenStudy (irishboy123):

Re-Legendre: For \(f = f(x,y)\), we know that: \(df = f_x dx +f_y dy \) we re-write that as: \(df = p dx +q dy \) Explicitly: \(p = f_x, q = f_y\) And so the indie variables are initially \((x,y)\) But we suggest that there is a function \(g = g(p,x)\) that simply has to follow this rule: \(g(p,x) = f - p x\) And that means that: \(dg = d(g(p,x) )= df - d(p x)\) i think this sucks \(= (p dx +q dy) - (x dp + p dx)\) \(= - x dp + q dy \) And then we can conclude that \(g(p,x)\) lines up with \(f(x,y)\), as simple as that ??

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!