If I solve a system and get infinite many solutions, will it be linearly independent?
other way round:(
So for it to be linearly independent it has to only have trivial solutions (nothing else) right?
I wouldn't normally comment on stuff like this because I have a working rather than theoretical knowledge of it,......., but you do seem to be in bit of a pickle :( Summary: For nxn matrix A, and nx1 vectors \(\mathbf x\) and \(\mathbf b\) in system \(A \mathbf x = \mathbf b\), then if A has a determinant \(A^{-1}\), it follows that there is a non trivial solution: \(A^{-1} A \mathbf x = A^{-1} \mathbf b , \implies \mathbf x = A^{-1} \mathbf b \) A hole bunch of other stuff follows too, especially the fact that the column vectors of A will be **linearly independent** and the row vectors of A will be **linearly independent**. And that might be what you are interested in, maybe. If A is non-invertible, then yes there is something wrong with your system. When the determinant is zero you can an infinite number of, or no solutions. Here is a simple and pretty crap 2x2 example. In the first, you are solving \(y = 2x + 1, y = 2x + 1\), infinite solutions: \(\left( \begin{matrix} 2 & -1 \\ 2 & -1 \end{matrix} \right) \left( \begin{matrix} x \\ y \end{matrix} \right) = \left( \begin{matrix} -1 \\ -1 \end{matrix} \right)\) In the second, you are solving \(y = 2x + 1, y = 2x + 2\), no solutions: \(\left( \begin{matrix} 2 & -1 \\ 2 & -1 \end{matrix} \right) \left( \begin{matrix} x \\ y \end{matrix} \right) = \left( \begin{matrix} -1 \\ -2 \end{matrix} \right)\) The determinant tells you something is wrong. And look at the row and column vectors. All that said, I am more familiar with **homogeneous** systems, \(A \mathbf x = \mathbf 0 \), where you may want there to be no inverse as in the case of systems of linear differential equations. Otherwise you could say the same thing, namely that \( \mathbf x = A^{-1} \mathbf 0 \implies \mathbf x= \mathbf O\) and you're stuffed with a trivial solution. This is where eigenvalues kick in. They avoid trivial solutions but denying the matrix an inverse.
PS This is the back page of Gilbert Strang's book. He presents this as Lin Alg for nxn matrices "In a Nutshell". And if he thinks that, it is worth taking seriously :) |dw:1481722893589:dw| His online MIT course is legendary but I doubt you have the time to watch much of it as he goes through in splendid detail. and the URL is case that doesn't show up too well https://i.gyazo.com/a436f7c20d713c1a61b2f10a11ff4c36.png Good luck
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!