How would you integrate 1+lnx ?
lnx isn't super obvious just by looking at it. It will require integration by parts.
Get the 1 out of the way so we can ignore it.\[\large\rm \int\limits 1+\ln x~dx\quad=\quad x+\int\limits \ln x~dx\]
\[\large\rm u=\ln x\qquad\qquad\qquad dv=dx\]Integrating lnx would be... hmm weird. That's what we're trying to get around anyway. So we want to differentiate our log instead. Hence, it is our u.
What's dv?
It's the invisible 1 next to the ln(x). ln(x) = 1*ln(x) We're integrating the 1.
oh ok
It's better to get comfortable with differentials though. dv = dx If that's confusing though, and you'd rather look at the function stuff, then yes, it's the 1.
\[\large\rm u=\ln x\qquad\qquad\qquad dv=dx\]So we get our other pieces that we need,\[\large\rm du=\frac1x~dx\qquad\qquad\qquad v=x\]
ok looks good
So umm.. one of things you might notice is... the log turns into a power of x when it's differentiated. That will mix nicely with our new v showing up.
So we get something like this from our parts, yes?\[\large\rm \int\limits \ln x~dx\quad=\quad x \ln x-\int\limits x\cdot\frac{1}{x}~dx\]Do you see how that new integral that shows up is much easier to deal with now?
ohh ok i see
\[\large\rm \int\limits\limits \ln x~dx\quad=\quad x \ln x-\int\limits dx\]
\[\large\rm \int\limits\limits\limits \ln x~dx\quad=\quad x \ln x-x+c\]
And then don't forget about the +1 that we integrated earlier on, right?
oh yeah so that would then cancel out this x right?
\[\large\rm \int\limits(1+\ln x)~dx\quad=\quad x \ln x+c\]Yayyy good job \c:/
thank you!!! This helped a lot!!!!
yay team
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!