Question

(US History) i know this is not math just help and collect your fan and medal

Answer 1

my answer is selected,

Answer 2

heheh
the indian population didn't really "cede" voluntarily the land per se
Jackson was fighting native tribes and with better technology, he won those battles
so, he in fact "conquered" those lands, those displacing natives, as it was the case many times as the Europeans engaged in armed conflict with the natives

btw, he did win the battle in 1812, with help of many natives, however back then communication over the atlantic took two weeks I think
by the time Jackson won against the British on that battle, the was had ended in a treaty in Britain, but the Americans didn't know till 2 weeks or so later

Answer 3

the war, not "was" that is
tis my typos day =)

Answer 4

lol ok so c? @jdoe0001

Answer 5

well, what do you think then?

your family has a war.... say the McCoys and the Kallikaks
and say the McCoy win the battle, and the Kallikaks "cede" per se
say, you're a McCoy.... does your family increase or decrease, expand or contracts over the same land the Kallikaks are using?

Answer 6

@jdoe0001 so i was right?

Answer 7

yep

Answer 8

thank you

Answer 9

medal me

Answer 10

tag me in a question and i will

Answer 11

hmmm

if the McCoys win the war, they'd take posession of the Kallikaks estates
and will more likely marginalize the Kallikaks

Jackson won those battles, not the Natives

so... the Natives would have ended up being marginized
so... yes. the population increased, but slightly if any