http://prntscr.com/dkfuke
this topic is confusing me @mathmale
|dw:1482110044098:dw|
ASA?
Hello, PuppFriend. Still nuts about puppies? A drawing is just about essential as you attempt to solve this problem. I draw one before doing anything else. Hope you'll take the time to do so also. In RST, <R is 60 degrees; in DEF, <F is also 60 degrees. RS = EF = 4. Note that in EDF, 40 degrees is given as the smallest angle. That makes it easily possilbe to calculate the measure of Angle E. Once you've drawn these 2 triangles side by side, label everything. Do the 2 triangles appear to be congruent or not congruent? By which rule?
ahemm, may note there are 180 degrees to all internal angles in a triangle
i believe they are congruent, the angles would be 80,60, and 40, and since the side 4 is given, i would say its congruent by angle side angle, ASA, but im not sure
id say either A or b
@mathmale
Before we move on, please find the measure of Angle E.
80
Right. Now, I see that angles R and S in the first triangle are congruent with angles E and F in the second. Agree or disagree?
I looked back to what you typed in earlier and see that you chose ASA as your grounds for calling the 2 triangles congruent. Now compare RT to DF. Do these 2 sides appear to be congruent or not? If you think they're congruent, which rule would you use to justify your answer?
I'll be back later.
agree rs=ef, rt and df should be congruent cuz the interior angles add up to 180
|dw:1482111252434:dw|
wait what the heck @sshayer
We have confirmed that the 2 triangles are congruent by ASA, that is, by the 60 degree angles, the 4 unit side and the 80 degree angle. If the 2 triangles are congruent, what does that tell you about any two corresponding sides?
that they are equal, right
Yes, that's it. So, your conclusion is ??? Please refer back to the original question and use words from it.
the answer is A, they are congruent, by ASA, and line FD
thank you sir
You're welcome, sir. ;)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!