Question

reason and proof
http://prntscr.com/h1hni6

Answer 1

http://prntscr.com/h1hnyh


choices

http://prntscr.com/h1hofx

Answer 2

its all one problem

Answer 3

i know the QA=QA is reflexive

Answer 4

Love these XD

Since QA bisects PQR then two congruent angles are created. Being \(\bf{\angle PQA \cong \angle RQA}\).

Answer 5

black ghost from pa!

Answer 6

indeed

Answer 7

ive always appreciated your help !

Answer 8

*bow* ;)

Answer 9

:)

Answer 10

so i was thinking for the second one

Answer 11

pqa=rqa for All right angles are congruent.

Answer 12

?

Answer 13

For Statement 2 that is correct.

Answer 14

Do you know what Statement 4 is?

Answer 15

so this is how its supposed to look like http://prntscr.com/h1hs7o

Answer 16

For Statement 2 it can not be \(\bf{\triangle PQA \cong \triangle RQA}\) since we have not proven anything yet. It would be \(\bf{\angle PQA \cong \angle RQA}\), this is due to a angle bisector creating 2 congruent angles.

The statement for 4 would be \(\bf{\angle QXA \cong \angle QYA}\) since the two angles are right angles, thus being congruent to each other.

The reflexive property is correct for Reason 5.

Answer 17

is this for statement 4 http://prntscr.com/h1hssz

Answer 18

That is read as `Statement 6` not 4 (they go by each row) just so we don't mix ourselves up.

The reason is correct but the statement is not. \(\bf{AAS~Congruence~Theorem}\) is used only when proving a triangle. Since we solved by from an angle-angle-side we proved by \(\bf{ \triangle QXA \cong \triangle QYA}\).

Answer 19

Do you understand what I typed?

Answer 20

yes i do i was just confused wth the row and columns is this how its supposed to look now ?
http://prntscr.com/h1hxsx

Answer 21

Looks good.

Answer 22

awesome thnx for your time !

Answer 23

np :)

Answer 24

im sorry i have one more are u still online ?

Answer 25

http://prntscr.com/h1hzfu

i did it all can you just tell me if im correct

Answer 26

last choice left http://prntscr.com/h1hzum

Answer 27

yea i am sorry i was helping another

Answer 28

take your time !

Answer 29

Looks amazing!

Answer 30

awesome !

Answer 31

Wait!

Answer 32

oh!

Answer 33

You got to switch two of them around, For the first blank of `Linear Pair Postulate` `Statement 3` it needs to be \(\bf{m \angle 2 + m \angle 3 = 180^{o}}\).

Answer 34

What was in place of `Statement 3` needs to be in `Statement 5`.

Answer 35

Other than that it looks golden.

Answer 36

thnx
<3

Answer 37

np ;)