Researchers at a university want to know if higher levels of nitrogen in fertilizer will increase the production of tomatoes per plant. Twenty plants are given normal levels of nitrogen and twenty other plants are given ten percent higher levels throughout the growing season. The plants receive the same levels of sunlight, water and are planted in the same soil on one farm. At the end of the experiment the average number of tomatoes produced is the same for each group. The scientists repeat the experiment on two additional farms further south that season. The researchers conclude that increasing nitrogen levels by 10% in tomatoes is not beneficial. Would this be a well designed reliable experiment? Support your decision with at least three reasons.
@Vocaloid
Here is my answer:
Yes, this would be a well designed and reliable experiment. And there are many reasons why. One of the reasons were that the experiment was tested multiple times to make sure they got the same results. The tests they made were all the same. And Lastly, the test was performed in a controlled environment with controlled variables.
With the right tools.
sounds good to me
Nice! I'm going to add it rn. :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!